Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

From Maastricht to Brexit by Richard Bellamy and Dario Castiglione

Publics and Material Representation

Environmental Policy
Policy Analysis
Climate Change
Panel Number
Panel Chair
David Laws
University of Amsterdam
Panel Co-Chair
Maarten Hajer
University of Utrecht
Panel Discussant
Jesse Hoffman
University of Utrecht

24/08/2018 14:00 - 15:40
Building: VMP 9 Floor: 3 Room: A315
In this panel we explore the influence that material representation—in pictures, plans, maps, stories, diagrams—has on the ways in which groups are able to engage with one another during the contingent episodes in which conflicts, problems, and futures are becoming public. In these episodes, citizens, experts, public officials, and other stakeholders come into interaction via processes of representation over a troubled past, a current conflict, or a future that they share but may not see in common. In pursuing the role of representation in these episodes, we follow Hannah Pitkin's (1967) argument that to understand representation we should examine the different ways in which the word gets used. Much attention has been given to the ways in which individuals and groups can be spoken and acted for and both the tensions this creates and the innovative responses these tensions have generated have been explored in practical and theoretical detail (cf. Urbanti and Warren, 2008; Nagel and Smith, 2013; Fung, 2015; Nabatchi and Leighninger, 2015). We focus here on an alternative use of representation that is prominent in practice, but has received less attention in analysis—the way in which memories, stories, problems, analyses, and ideas about the future get material representation in the interactions among stakeholders. Our goal is to explore the ways in which relevant physical and economic features, memories, aspirations, and options for the future are rendered in tangible forms and the influence this has on the ability of groups to engage one and other and the problems and issues that link them to each other (Latour, 2005, 1999; Star and Griesemer, 1989; Winner, 1980; Innes, 1951). We try to understand how these representations affect the balance between the development of relationality, exchange, and deliberation and the creation of forms of exclusion (Pitkin, 2013).

The papers examine these tensions and dynamics in grounded practices of futuring, planning, policy implementation, contestation, and conflict resolution. In these practices memories, perceptions, technical analyses, and visions of the future get represented in pictures, pamphlets, memorials, plans, maps, stories, diagrams, installations and visualizations. The papers analyze the contingencies that develop in this process, the way participants address them, and the ways in the forms of material representation enable and limit the practical reflection, disputing, visioning, and negotiation that we associate with a democratic public capable of deliberation and action.

Paper List

Title Details
Politiziced Visuals for Sustainable Energy: ‘Evidence’ of Candor and Deceit, or an Opportunity for Democratization? View Paper Details
Relating Past, Present, and Future: The Role of Material Representations in Reflective and Deliberative Practice View Paper Details
Techniques of Futuring: Imagining Sustainable Cities of Tomorrow View Paper Details
Trash, Ownership, and Environmentalism View Paper Details
When Culture Meets Societal Transformation: on Cultural Practices as Techniques of Futuring View Paper Details
Share this page

Back to top