ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

In person icon Quantifying Judicial Impact: Selection, Process, and Authority

Comparative Politics
Courts
Jurisprudence
Quantitative
Judicialisation
P400
Benjamin G. Engst
Norwegian University of Science & Technology, Trondheim
Louisa Boulaziz
Universitetet i Oslo
Benjamin G. Engst
Norwegian University of Science & Technology, Trondheim

Abstract

This panel addresses critical questions on judicial power and legitimacy: Why are some individuals appointed to the bench while others are not? To what extent do judicial procedures influence judicial outcomes? Why is judicial authority often overwhelmingly perceived as legitimate? We invite papers that examine these topics quantitatively and comparatively. Addressing these issues is essential to understanding the often unquestioned acceptance of judicial decisions and court’s societal influence.

Title Details
Judicial Reform and Gender Representation: Are Women Just as Likely as Men to Get Selected to Court? View Paper Details
The Politics of Legal Diplomacy: Understanding State Support Before International Courts View Paper Details
Who Files a Constitutional Complaint for Equality? View Paper Details
Prosecutors and Courts Between Law Enforcement and Rights Protection: Insights from the COVID-19-Pandemic in Chile View Paper Details
Judicial Influence: Trust and Climate Litigation Outcomes in European Democracies View Paper Details