Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.
Just tap then “Add to Home Screen”
Provided that constitutional review spreads across the democratic systems we need to systematically test the various approaches and theories developed for the US Supreme Court (Maveety 2003) and create some specific comparative theories. We expect the papers to follow this perspective in order to improve the understanding of judicial politics in contemporary politics. Given the narrow focus of existing studies they may comparatively investigate a number of issues regarding courts and judicial politics such as institution-building, institutional settings (judge appointment, court access, types of review, court rules), intra-court decision-making (judicial preferences, agenda-setting, case selection), and the relation between courts and other actors (government, parliament, public, lower courts, other Courts, European Court of Justice).
| Title | Details |
|---|---|
| Do the Kinds of Action Influence the Politicisation of Constitutional Courts? A Measurement Proposal and First Empirical Evidence from a Paired Comparison | View Paper Details |
| Constitutional Review and Institutional Accountability: The Case of Poland | View Paper Details |
| Optimal Dockets | View Paper Details |
| Are Judges Agents of Political Parties? Analysis Based on Dissenting Opinion in Federal Constitutional Court of Germany | View Paper Details |
| Politics or Policy: Influences on Prosecutorial Behaviour | View Paper Details |