Install the app
Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.
Just tap then “Add to Home Screen”
Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.
Just tap then “Add to Home Screen”
Menu
Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.
Just tap then “Add to Home Screen”
Building: Faculty of Social Sciences, Floor: 1, Room: FS115
Thursday 15:50 - 17:30 CEST (08/09/2016)
The methodology of comparison is a key factor for this research agenda. We need to carefully explore the various ways of analysing and comparing judicial politics. Beyond the traditional qualitative and quantitative divide we wish to underline the challenge of analysing judicial decisions written in different languages. Data collection and standardisation is an essential condition for successful comparative research. A special focus will lie on the analysis of judicial text corpora.
| Title | Details |
|---|---|
| Addressing an external audience: an empirical analysis of citation practices of the Belgian Constitutional Court | View Paper Details |
| Trials and Tribulations: On the Difficulties of Observing the Truth | View Paper Details |
| Constitutions Without Any Protection: The limits of judicial structures during the state of emergency | View Paper Details |
| Justice seen by citizens: controversial reasoning over functions and functioning | View Paper Details |
| Ideology, Law and Professional Background. Explaining Dissenting Opinions in the German Federal Constitutional Court | View Paper Details |