Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.
Just tap then “Add to Home Screen”
Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.
Just tap then “Add to Home Screen”
Building: VMP 5, Floor: 2, Room: 2194
Thursday 11:00 - 12:40 CEST (23/08/2018)
In this panel, we examine how the emerging powers, China and Russia – the traditional opponents to the concept – view and apply the set of policies regarding intervention that ally with their otherwise diverse foreign policy preferences. The discussion of these policies is more important given that these are, in fact, strong responses from UN SC permanent members, as its member states shape and determine the extent and application of the concept for practical purposes overall.
Title | Details |
---|---|
Russia and the Humanitarian Intervention Debate | View Paper Details |
Why No Humanitarian Intervention in the Rohingya Crisis? A Political Alignment Between the West and China | View Paper Details |
Emerging Non-Traditional Norms of Military Humanitarian Intervention: Russian Rhetoric at the United Nations Towards Interventions in Georgia and Ukraine | View Paper Details |