ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

Back to Panel Details
Back to Panel Details

Methods in Political Science

Political Methodology
Political Theory
Mixed Methods
P264
Elvira Rosert
Universität Hamburg
Isabel Flores
Centro de Investigação e Estudos de Sociologia – CIES-IUL
Open Section

Saturday 14:00 - 15:40 (25/08/2018)

Building: VMP 8 Floor: Ground Room: 05

Abstract

Does a publication bias in the reporting of research results really exist? And where does it come from? What methods can we use to build typologies? And how can we improve applications of Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA)? The panel will address these questions by pursuing two aims: It will analyze the claim of a publication bias by examining publication patterns, providing different explanations and suggesting remedies. It will present, apply and criticize new advances in research methods such as QCA or cluster analysis, and introduce alternative strategies such as Configural Frequency Analysis or employing family resemblance to define descriptive heterogeneity.

Title Details
Publication Bias in Qualitative Comparative Analysis View Paper Details
Small Act, Huge Effect: Algorithmic Sources of Publication Bias in Political Science Research View Paper Details
Building Empirical Configurational Typologies with Regularized Loglinear Models View Paper Details
Dealing with Descriptive Heterogeneity in Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (FsQCA) View Paper Details