ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

The Limitations of the Inside Track – Understanding the Real Agenda Setting Power of the Commission in the EU Policy Process

Comparative Politics
European Politics
European Union
Executives
Institutions
Quantitative
Amie Kreppel
University of Florida
Amie Kreppel
University of Florida

Abstract

The literature on agenda-setting powers of European institutions considers the Commission to be a primary actor in determining the European policy agenda, thanks to the both the formal and informal powers it holds. This article demonstrates that despite the Commission’s formal powers of initiation and technical resources within the policy making process it does not have the capacity to control the European Union’s agenda-setting process at all times. Indeed, in the past decade, just forty per cent of all legislation adopted by the EU institutions was directly derived from the stated policy priorities of the Commission. The evolution of the European institutions under different treaties, and the subsequent changes in power dynamics, thus appear to have undermined the alleged monopoly of the Commission to effectively shape the European policy agenda. The decline in the agenda setting powers of the Commission has not been monotonic however; it has varied significantly both over time and across policy arena. By identifying these variations in the agenda setting influence of the Commission vis-à-vis other actors over time, this article constructs an original dataset and tests the hypotheses that the Commission’s status as primary agenda-setter works better in regulatory and/or technical issue areas, policy arenas in which other actors have less interest or knowledge. Through this analysis, our research investigates the extent to which we are witnessing a generalized loss of agenda-setting power for the Commission, or a case of institutional adaptation to changing circumstances as the Commission shifts its focus to more technical issue and frequently less politically salient areas.