ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

Uncertainty and Legal Disintegration: Evidence from Brexit

European Politics
European Union
Courts
Decision Making
Brexit
Empirical
Arthur Dyevre
KU Leuven
Arthur Dyevre
KU Leuven
Monika Glavina
Erasmus University Rotterdam
Nicolas Lampach
KU Leuven
Michal Ovadek
University College London
Wessel Wijtvliet
KU Leuven

Abstract

When does uncertainty about continuing membership in a highly integrated polity like the EU starts affecting the behaviour of judges and litigants? The Brexit vote in June 2016 has created uncertainty around the application of EU law and the authority of the European Court of Justice in the UK legal system. While the UK is still formally part of the EU, we argue that this uncertainty is affecting the propensity of British judges and litigants, discouraging them to invoke EU law and to refer cases to the European Court of Justice. Using data on referral activity between 1973 and 2017, we apply a difference-in-difference design to evaluate the effect the impact of the Brexit vote on the referral propensity of British courts. We find strong evidence that the Brexit vote is adversely affecting the use of EU law. We conclude that, while politicians are still struggling to define the terms of the UK’s relationship with the EU, the vote has already begun to unravel the fabric of legal integration.