ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

Exclusionary Politics Vis A Vis Extremist Parties: Citizens between Instrumental Pragmarics and Democratic Principles

Koen Abts
KU Leuven
Koen Abts
KU Leuven
Marc SWYNGEDOUW
KU Leuven

Abstract

How should political parties deal with extremist parties? In the Netherlands an accommodating approach to Wilders prevails, while in Flanders political actors pursue a much more repressive approach against Vlaams Belang. Although the democratic coalition against the extreme right in Flanders is maintained, the effectiveness and legitimacy of the exclusion politics is regularly under discussion. Mostly, the political or normative debate is at the forefront, while there is little data about public opinion. In this article we try to determine how Flemish citizens think about the cordon sanitaire using the results of 80 in-depth interviews. The results show that public opinion is based on pragmatism, strategy and principles. The pragmatic vision depends on citizen’s definition of the party and citizen’s assessment of the risks associated with the participation to government, while principled arguments are dependent of the fundamental meaning of democracy. The issue of the meaning of democracy is the main focus of this paper distinguishing the conception of populist democracy and liberal democracy as the battleground of discussion (cf. Abts & Rummens, 2007; Rummens & Abts, 2010).