Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.
Just tap then “Add to Home Screen”
Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.
Just tap then “Add to Home Screen”
Building: A - Faculty of Law, Floor: 3, Room: 305
Tuesday 08:30 - 10:15 CEST (05/09/2023)
Although courts might seem as overly formal institutions, in fact, both courts and judges are subject to informality – from bureaucratic practices and behavioural norms to clientelism or patronage. In recent years, we have seen a significant increase of scholarly interest in some of informal judicial institutions, particularly targeting corruption, clientelism, or informal factors influencing judicial impartiality and decision-making. The effect of informal institutions and the dynamics of their relationship with formal institutional designs however runs much deeper. Informal rules and practices reshape dynamics of competence distribution, empower some actors while weaken other in ways we fail to see and understand while examining only formal structures. This panel focuses on the role of informality in the design of judicial governance and aims to understand how the discrepancy between de iure and de facto dimensions of judicial independence, accountability, or power distribution is formed in practice. The topic is particularly salient in the face of continuous supranational attempts to develop judicial blueprints that would successfully travel across states and prove resilient to populist challenges or autocratic attacks.
Title | Details |
---|---|
From a court of appeal to a court of precedent: How docket reforms have transformed Nordic high courts’ attention to legal issues | View Paper Details |
Judicial Councils Everywhere | View Paper Details |
Judicial Self-Governance Index: The Role of Court Presidents in Judicial Governance | View Paper Details |
Informal Constraints and Judicial Councils as Fourth Branch Institutions in the Western Balkans | View Paper Details |
Voting protocols as informal judicial institutions: a case study of its perils in Mexico | View Paper Details |