Install the app
Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.
Just tap then “Add to Home Screen”
Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.
Just tap then “Add to Home Screen”
Menu
Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.
Just tap then “Add to Home Screen”
Policy actors may change their belief systems during crises to interpret and assess potentially negative consequences. The panel plots this interaction across several theoretical planes – multiple streams, narrative policy and advocacy coalition among others – and methodological approaches – discursive, qualitative and quantitative. The end result is a fruitful conversation among policy perspectives, using different methodologies to specify the paths and intensity of policy change (or stasis).
| Title | Details |
|---|---|
| The Importance of Narratives for Agenda Setting. A Multiple Streams Analysis of Policy Instability in German Unemployment benefits. | View Paper Details |
| Transforming Flood Risk Communication in Limburg Province, the Netherlands: A Historical Perspective and Strategic Insights from Advocacy Coalition Framework | View Paper Details |
| Protective Policies as Emotional Safety Nets: An Agenda for MSF Research | View Paper Details |
| The Politics of Crisis Management Policies | View Paper Details |
| Framing the Sea: The Role of Discursive Networks in EU Fisheries Policymaking | View Paper Details |