ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

From Concepts to Indicators: Availability, Quality and Gaps in Existing “Ready-To-Use” Measures of Corruption

Methods
Comparative Perspective
Corruption
Empirical
P233
Ilona Wysmułek
Polish Academy of Sciences
Gustavo Gouvêa Maciel
Universidade de Lisboa Instituto de Ciências Sociais
Luis de Sousa
Universidade de Lisboa Instituto de Ciências Sociais

Abstract

This panel focuses on the quality and fitness-for-purpose of existing corruption indicators and measures. It examines what data currently exists, how it varies across sources and contexts, and, importantly, how well these measures serve different analytical, comparative and policy-oriented purposes. Starting from the premise that measurement challenges are inseparable from conceptual ones, the panel approaches corruption indicators as tools whose validity and usefulness depend on their fit with underlying definitions, research purposes, and broader research designs. We invite critical reflections on widely used corruption indicators, including the links between definitions of corruption and measurement strategies, their conceptual clarity, operational coherence, and limitations. The panel welcomes both conceptual and empirical contributions that engage with “ready-to-use” corruption measures and assess their strength, weaknesses, and conditions of appropriate use. We particularly encourage papers addressing, among others, the following themes: - proposing framework for evaluating the quality of corruption indicators; - developing strategies to assess validity, comparability and sustainability of corruption measures - identifying gaps in existing corruption data sources and offering frameworks for developing new measures - analyzing the links between data production and management practices, open access challenges, quality and the (re)use of corruption measures - systematizing relevant conceptual aspects of corruption to develop more targeted and practical measurements.

Title Details
Detecting Favoritistic Legislation: A New Set of Indicators with Cross-Country Validations View Paper Details
Good Governance Indicators as an Indicators of Corruption – Why Not? View Paper Details
Adaptive Tolerance to Corruption: Adaptive Responses and Pragmatic Attitudes in European Public Opinion View Paper Details
Mapping Corruption Measurement: Updating a Database of Survey Questions View Paper Details
Data Management Plan Implication for Corruption Research: Mapping Tensions and Boundaries View Paper Details