Building: Jean-Brillant Floor: 4 Room: B-4325

---

Abstract

The descriptive representation of groups such as women or immigrants in parliamentary assemblies is uneven across advanced democracies. Traditionally, normative political theorists have dominated the scholarly debate about descriptive representation. The conceptual and normative debate focused on arguments for and against descriptive representation. The empirical study of the sources of these variations has lagged behind. This was largely due to the lack of comparative data. A number of cross-national projects such as the Pathways project have made some progress in recent years to produce comparative data across a number of countries as well as across time. This allows scholars to explore the impact of macro-level variables (such as institutions and political opportunity structures) and their interaction with meso-level and micro-level variables on the descriptive representation of particular social groups in advanced democracies. This panel brings together scholars that use a variety of empirical and theoretical approaches to capture and explain variations in descriptive representation.

Title	Details
The Impact of Migration Flows, Public Opinion and Party Strategies on the Representation of Immigrant Origin Minorities in Countries of Recent Immigration. A Comparison of Italy and Spain	View Paper Details
Citizenship, Parliamentary Access and Ethnic Groupness: Explaining the Political Integration of New Europeans in Britain, France, Germany and the Netherlands	View Paper Details
Immigrants’ Representation in Industrialized Democracies	View Paper Details
Shifts in Ethnic Minority Representation. An Intersectional Analysis of Ethnicity and Gender in Dutch Parliament, 1986-2012	View Paper Details
Nominating Women for EP Elections: Exploring the Role of Political Parties’ Recruitment Procedures	View Paper Details