ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

Expertization of Policy-advice: Institutional Variation and Normative Responses

Democracy
Elites
Decision Making
P121
Cathrine Holst
Universitetet i Oslo
Kathia Serrano Velarde
Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg

Building: BL07 P.A. Munchs hus, Floor: 1, Room: PAM SEM2

Saturday 11:00 - 12:40 CEST (09/09/2017)

Abstract

What is the role of academic expertise in different channels of policy advice? Some argue that the previous dominance of academic expertise in policy advice has been replaced by more “pluralist” and “hybrid” advice arrangements. Others argue that governance relies extensively and perhaps even increasingly on academic expertise. Is policy advice becoming more or less reliant on academic expertise? How does the increasing role of experts in policy-making affect and challenge transparency, accountability and representation? What does expertization – or alternatively hybridization – of policy advice imply for democratic legitimacy and the quality of policy-making? The panel invites papers that seek to explore, explain and/or assess developments and variation in policy advice, with a particular focus on the role of academic expertise and experts and implications for democracy and governance.

Title Details
Expertisation of the EU Commission’s Expert Groups? View Paper Details
Accountability of Expertise in Courts and Public Governance View Paper Details
More Experts - More Expertise? On the Use of Experts in Danish Official Committees 1980-2016 View Paper Details
Expertization of Policy Advice: A Cross-Sectoral Analysis View Paper Details
Consensus-based or Partisan? Expertization of Public Advisory Committees in Norway 1972-2016 View Paper Details