ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

A common-based approach to urban policymaking: self-government, co-production and popular control in the Citizen Asset Programme in Barcelona

Civil Society
Democratisation
Public Policy
Political Engagement
Policy-Making
Iolanda Bianchi
Universiteit Antwerpen
Iolanda Bianchi
Universiteit Antwerpen

Abstract

Over the last decade, common-inspired public policies enabling citizens to self-manage resources and services have unevenly proliferated across European cities. Broadly speaking, these policies entail local governments supporting citizens in the self-management of urban resources and services. This article refers to this trend as a “common-based approach to urban policy-making”. Several authors have pointed to the democratising capacity of the common-based approach to urban policymaking. In their discourse, the promotion of direct democracy through citizens' self-government seems to imply that this approach is more democratic in nature. However, as political scientists working in the field of co-production have argued, enabling citizens to self-manage urban resources and services cannot be considered as a democratising practice per se. In this article we aim to analyse whether and how a common-based approach to urban policymaking is a democratising policy approach. The article qualitatively analyses a paradigmatic case of a common-based approach to urban policymaking, the Patrimoni Ciutadà [Citizen Asset] programme, which was promoted by the municipalist government of Barcelona en Comú in Barcelona. It aims to foster citizens’ self-management of local public facilities and spaces. The article contends that the Citizen Asset programme is a democratising policy approach. However, democratisation is not exclusively given by the implementation of self-government but by incorporating modalities of co-production and popular control into the whole policy process, making it "non-appropriable".