Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.
Just tap then “Add to Home Screen”
In comparative political economy there is growing academic interest in the historical origins of different models of capitalism. Differences between later Coordinated and Liberal Market Economies are mapped in various subsystems such as corporate governance, welfare systems, skill formation regimes, or industrial relations. It is argued that interdependencies and complementarities between these systems are caused by different patterns of pre-industrial economic coordination, of electoral systems, or legal systems. However, whether the complementarity thesis fits the historical record of political economies is rarely investigated. This panel addresses this gap and delivers various plausibility probes of the complementarity hypotheses. These tests are based on quantitative and qualitative methods and investigate various subsystems and institutions, namely, interdependencies between electoral systems, skill formation, trade policies, social policies, financial systems and labor market regulation.
| Title | Details |
|---|---|
| The Paradox of Power: Dismissal Protection in the First Half of the 20th Century | View Paper Details |
| Varieties of Financial Accounting: An Historical Analysis of Britain, Germany and the Netherlands | View Paper Details |
| Trade, Institutions and Social Policy in the Long Run | View Paper Details |
| Varieties of Capitalism During the 19th Century. Do They Exist ? Do They Explain Political Developments ? | View Paper Details |
| Catholicism, Corporatism and Complementarities | View Paper Details |