Affective Politics in Southern Europe

Abstract

There is a heightened general perception among experts and pundits that current democratic politics are becoming increasingly emotional. The argument is that attachment to certain political identities and the basic emotions they provoke are becoming the dominant “mode of reasoning” among citizens in contemporary politics. This process, known as affective polarisation increasingly divides the world into in-groups and out-groups, transforming and reducing complex societal issues into a single dimension of “Us” versus “Them”. The intensity of citizens’ ensuing inter-identity prejudices exceeds that produced by more traditional ideological polarisation, limiting citizens’ ability to find common ground and areas of dialogue in order to constructively and consensually address mutual challenges. This process has also been linked to many contemporary illnesses of democracy, such as incivility, support for outright violence among citizens, the deterioration of democratic quality and accountability during elections, democratic malfunctioning, support for new illiberal parties, and ultimately democratic backsliding. Despite the relevance of this topic and the increasing body of comparative literature exploring it, existing knowledge is riddled with contradictions and inconclusive results. This panel seeks original and novel contributions to participate on this broad topic but centered in the South European Democracies. In particular, this research topic aims to attract manuscripts addressing issues broadly related to some of the following questions: ▪️ How are the increasing levels of affective polarization related to the observed decrease in trust in political parties and elites? ▪️ How does it relate to increasing levels of electoral volatility and emergence of new parties? ▪️ What is the connection between affective polarization and expressive partisanship in comparison to its connection with instrumental partisanship? ▪️ Can we improve better incorporate social identification theory into the conceptualization of affective polarization? ▪️ What is its connection with traditional ideological conflicts such as left versus right? ▪️ What is the interrelationship of affective polarization and the emergence and success of radical right-wing parties? ▪️ What role do political elites play in this process? Social media? ▪️ Is it inherently pernicious for all democracies and their citizens? ▪️ What are the most noteworthy consequences for democratic functioning and support for non-democratic alternatives? ▪️ What are the effects it might have on other basic attitudes such social and political trust, and support for liberal democratic principles? ▪️ What are its effects on democratic accountability, such as the electoral processes and the acceptance of their outcomes?

Title	Details
Affective polarization, political distrust, and populist attitudes: longitudinal evidence from Italy	View Paper Details
Where do vox votes come from? A study case on the votes' origin of the extreme right in Madrid's region	View Paper Details
Hate Will Tear Us Apart: Affective Polarization in the Iberian Peninsula	View Paper Details