ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

Regulating Digital Technologies Part 2: Compliance and Enforcement

Governance
Public Policy
Regulation
Business
Technology
Big Data
Policy-Making
ANT026
Colin Provost
University College London
Anne Meuwese
Leiden University

Building: Brantijser, Floor: 1, Room: SJ.117

Thursday 14:30 - 16:00 CEST (13/07/2023)

Abstract

Recent advances in digital technological innovation have presented significant new challenges to regulators and lawmakers. While these innovations may make important contributions to society, they also present potential new market failures that need to be addressed. Autonomous vehicles raise new questions around road safety, algorithms in government have the potential to discriminate against people of particular gender/ethnicity, facial recognition systems may violate civil liberties, tech platforms may spread disinformation while unlawfully violating data privacy laws, to list a few salient examples. In each instance, regulators must consult and gather information in order to identify the relevant market failures, as well as methods of mitigating those failures. Flexible regulatory tools, such as management-based regulation or meta-regulation have been advocated here, as well as incremental, adaptive approaches, which emphasise careful monitoring and evaluation in order to learn more about the products themselves and their potential dangers. In other instances, outright bans have been urged if the cost of the market failure is too high. However, achieving a balance which allows innovation to grow while limiting the negative consequences remains a challenge. For this panel, we welcome papers which investigate methods/instruments/tools of regulating technological challenges. In particular, we are interested in papers taking a comparative perspective, across regulatory approaches or across areas of technology. A further area of interest for this panel consists of case studies regarding how regulators and lawmakers deal with balancing precaution and innovation.

Title Details
Regulatory sandboxes and innovation in practice: Lessons from the UK’s regulatory sandbox for fintech View Paper Details
CONTENT MODERATION’S BACK YARD: REDUCING VISIBILITY OF CONTENT ON DIGITAL PLATFORMS View Paper Details
Appropriating Business Information Technology for Co-Regulatory Purposes View Paper Details
Regulatory Space, Regulatory Intermediaries and Socio-Technical Systems: The Challenges and Opportunities of AI-Based Regulatory Technology View Paper Details