Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.
Just tap then “Add to Home Screen”
Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.
Just tap then “Add to Home Screen”
Building: A - Faculty of Law, Floor: 4, Room: 405
Monday 13:30 - 15:15 CEST (04/09/2023)
With the decline of open climate denialism – is delay the new denial? We are witnessing a shift in the climate policy debate. Many actors opposed to ambitious climate policy no longer deny the seriousness of the issue, or the cause of it. Instead, they often advocate a delayed ‘just’ energy transition avoiding societal and economic change now, moving it rather to an unspecified future. Such strategies can include advocating a cautious approach dependent on future technological advances that avoid societal and economic change in the present. A broad consensus over pursuing a ‘Just Transition’ to ‘Net Zero’ hides significant contestation, including between those advocating ambitious climate strategy and those opposing it, either outright or through a strategy of delayed policy and delayed policy implementations. This panel welcomes contributions exploring practices of climate obstruction and delayism in different regions and sectors.
Title | Details |
---|---|
Populist Right Wing Discursive Tactics in European Regional Decarbonization | View Paper Details |
The varying levels of climate delayism in Central Asia: consequences for the region’s geopolitics of the energy transition | View Paper Details |
To Deny or to Delay: Climate action delayism and its relationships with climate change anxiety and denialism | View Paper Details |
"Climate obstruction efforts in the EU" | View Paper Details |
Contesting just transitions: Climate delay and the contradictions of labour environmentalism | View Paper Details |