ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

Bilateralism and European integration: a side effect of the polycrisis in the EU?

European Union
Foreign Policy
Integration
International Relations
Member States
P021
Sarah Wolff
Queen Mary, University of London
Ana E. Juncos
University of Bristol
Agathe Piquet
Université catholique de Louvain
Richard Whitman
University of Kent

Building: Colégio Almada Negreiros, Room: CAN 217

Friday 09:00 - 10:30 BST (21/06/2024)

Abstract

This panel questions the relationship between this intensification of bilateralism and European integration in times of crisis. In the past decade, European capitals have sought to intensify their bilateral links, in the field of foreign policy, security and defence, but also in sectoral areas such as migration and border control, fisheries, trade, scientific cooperation. Brexit and the increased differentiation at the EU’s borders with Switzerland, Norway or Iceland, have led to a strengthening of bilateral ties between EU member states and third countries as well as between EU member states i.e. Quirinal treaty between France and Italy. So far scholarship has studied bilateralism as a strategy for EU member states to upload their preferences to Brussels (or to block those not matching their preferences), but also as a strategy to move European integration forward (Bulmer and Parkes, 2007), focusing for instance on the importance of a strong Franco-German or Franco-British relationship (Mattelaer, 2019). The Eurozone debt crisis and the COVID-19 crisis, have led to a revival of bilateralism, often with a policy-oriented objective (Mattelaer, 2019) which support further (coordinative) europeanisation (Ladi and Wolff, 2021). To what extent has the ‘polycrisis’ led to a renewal of bilateralism amongst EU member states or with non-EU MS? What is the purpose of this renewed bilateralism, and what is its relationship with politicisation and European integration? Is this trend a feature of the ‘polycrisis’ or more widely of a crisis of ‘multilateralism’ as argued by Newman (2006)? Or is it supporting further Europeanisation, or rather hindering it?

Title Details
Bilateralism in multilateralism: France and Germany in key episodes of European integration politics and history View Paper Details
Out of Sight, out of Mind? How UK bilateralism with European capitals in times of Politicisation enables Europeanisation to continue View Paper Details
The EU’s polycrisis, bilateralism and European integration: evidence from the Portuguese case during the Eurozone crisis and Brexit View Paper Details
Memory, Discursive Recontextualization and Geopolitical Codes: The Mnemonic Dimension of the Bilateral Security Cooperation between Sweden and Finland View Paper Details