ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

Systematic Qualitative Comparisons in Comparative Research

39
Daniele Caramani
University of Zurich

Abstract

This panel focuses on the role of comparison in comparative case study research. Small-N Comparison (and thus control) increases the researcher's leverage on the research question, but only moderately. Research design and case selection are therefore dependent on the kind of (causal) questions asked in qualitative analysis. If the goal is to develop complex explanations for specific puzzles, the role of comparison may be to control for broad background factors; if the goal is to explore a particular causal pattern, comparison may help to isolate this pattern. The panel focuses on this interaction of research questions and research design.

Title Details
Comparative Research Designs in the Study of Regulation: How to Increase the Number of Cases without Compromising the Strengths of Case-oriented Analysis View Paper Details
How the Cases You Choose Limit the Questions You Ask: Selection Problems in Comparative Research Designs View Paper Details
Bounded generalisations. Embedding and contextualizing comparative case studies View Paper Details