Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.
Just tap then “Add to Home Screen”
This panel focuses on normative questions that arise in a global context, in particular to what extent are international distributive effects consistent with different justice norms? Internationally, the benefits of multilateral environmental agreements are often reaped by the rich Northern countries which can make most immediate economic use of natural resources while substantial shares of costs also have to be borne by the developing countries. Accordingly, many of these states fear that international environmental agreements will limit their potential for economic growth and social development. Most recent environmental agreements contain clauses on technology and transfer and financial support for developing countries. But it remains a hotly debated issue whether this suffices to balance the unequal burdens that many international environmental agreements impose on developed and developing countries.
| Title | Details |
|---|---|
| Biodiversity, Genetic Resource Management and Global Innovation Ethics | View Paper Details |
| Fair Trading: An Oxymoron? An analysis of Justice Principles for cap-and-trade Mechanisms | View Paper Details |
| Social Justice and the Guyana-Norway REDD+ Agreement | View Paper Details |
| Distributive Justice in the International Biodiversity Regime – An example from India | View Paper Details |
| Ground Challenges to Collective Governance of Urban-cprs and Public Goods | View Paper Details |