Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.
Just tap then “Add to Home Screen”
Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.
Just tap then “Add to Home Screen”
Domestic governments as well as NGOs, interest groups and IOs are now deemed important actors in public debates on and as parts of international politics. Consequently, we see an increasing output of studies about how such actors build (a) communication capacities, (b) choose strategies to communicate and (c) affect the way public debates and opinions evolve. However, we note a considerable gap in communication between studies of different intellectual origins although they share a common interest in public communication in international politics. The workshop seeks to (re)connect respective debates in IR, political communication and sociology that all share an interest in the role of strategic communication in international politics and its impact on how relevant publics think and (inter)act. It wants to shed light on questions such as: – How do international organizations communicate their policies to the public? How successful are they in shaping public and elite opinion across the world? – How do governmental actors and other domestic elites react to shock events in IR in order to secure or gain domestic support? How successful are they in doing so? And under which conditions are they successful or not? – How do NGOs and interest groups seek support for their position toward international policies such as the TTIP or the fight against Islamic Terror? How successful are they in shaping public and elite opinion across the world? – How and to what extent do the different communication strategies by different actors collide or coincide? Under which conditions does one strategy ‘win’ over another one? We are interested mainly in empirical research which confronts such or related questions by using a quantitative and/or qualitative design, without per se excluding theoretical research.
Title | Details |
---|---|
Communicability in UK Foreign Policy: How Public Communication Concerns can Shape Policy Substance | View Paper Details |
The Challenges Foreign Ministries Face in Cyberspace: An Analysis of Different Communication Strategies and their Consequences | View Paper Details |
Communicating Eurozone Debt Crisis in China: The Role of and Challenges to Chinese Media Elites | View Paper Details |
Constructing and Communicating National Prestige at Home. The People’s Daily and the 2014 APEC Summit in Beijing | View Paper Details |
Corrective Information and Public Opinion About Trade Agreements | View Paper Details |
Mass Mobilization for Justice: Exploring Public Engagement around International Courts | View Paper Details |
The Ukraine Crisis as an Unintended Consequence of the EU’s Public Diplomacy | View Paper Details |
One for All? Public Confidence in National, Regional, and International Institutions | View Paper Details |
Informational Demand across the Globe: Towards a Comparative Understanding of Information Exchange | View Paper Details |
Legitimation Challenge or Public Policy Problem? The Public Communication of EU Elites in the Eurozone Crisis | View Paper Details |
Explaining Arab Public Opinion Toward International Organizations: The Role of Elite Communication | View Paper Details |
UN Public Communication in the Arms Trade Treaty Process: Transparency, Advocacy or Self-Legitimation? | View Paper Details |
Humanitarian Advocacy: Public Communications Strategies of International Humanitarian Agencies for the Protection of Civilians | View Paper Details |
From Washington to Berlin via Brussels and Back: The IMF as Challenger of Discursive Framing Strategies in the European Debt Crisis | View Paper Details |
Combatting 'Press Censorship' in Post-Conflict Kosovo: Can NGOs Impact the Policy Agenda of International Organisations? | View Paper Details |