Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.
Just tap then “Add to Home Screen”
Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.
Just tap then “Add to Home Screen”
Monday 29 February to Friday 4 March 2016
Generally classes are either 09:00-12:30 or 14:00-17:30
15 hours over 5 days
This course is intended for PhD students who have just started an interpretive or qualitative research project. The course is primarily aimed at students of political science, sociology, international relations and public administration, but students of other social science disciplines such as public policy and anthropology will also benefit from it. The course is organised around the typical steps of a research process - from how to formulate an interpretive research question to how to present and document analyses. It introduces a broad spectrum of interpretive approaches with a focus in particular on narrative methods and discourse analysis during all sessions of the course. These two approaches provide a good representation of different interpretive strategies, and by understanding their logics and uses students will be able to select a particular research strategy that best fits with their own research question. The course provides students with a working knowledge of interpretive methods, including insights into how they can be used in practice in an interpretive research process.
Marie Østergaard Møller is Associate Professor at Aalborg University in Denmark.
Her research interests include social and political categories, categorisation, frontline work, welfare state research, classic social theory of solidarity, and systematic qualitative methods.
Read more about Marie here.
This course provides students with an introduction to different interpretive methods. Students will learn to ‘read’ texts while becoming familiar with contemporary thinking about interpretation, narrative, and discourse. During the course we will focus on narrative method, hermeneutics, phenomenology, discourse analysis, deconstruction method and genealogy.
The course is organised with the following six objectives in mind: (1) To examine the scientific criteria of interpretive research and to give students basic training in how to formulate interpretive research questions. (2) To expose students to issues of conceptualisation, theory, research design, and strategies of framing questions and selecting cases. (3) To assist students in how to organise and process material through interpretive coding strategies. (4) To provide students with knowledge about how to choose the best strategy of interpretation for the research question. (5) To introduce students to how to condense and present interpretations and finally (6) how to draw conclusions from interpretive analyses.
The course will cover the basic techniques for collecting, interpreting, and presenting analyses. Throughout the course we will operate on two interrelated dimensions, one focused on the theoretical approaches to various types of interpretive research, the other focused on the practical techniques of data collection, coding strategies and interpretive strategies of analysis, writing, and presenting findings.
Theoretically, the course considers questions such as the following: What is ‘interpretive’ research? What questions is it best suited for? By what criteria does it meet or fail to meet the standards of scientific evidence? What are the roles of concepts in interpretive research? Can interpretive methods verify hypotheses, or only generate them? Can interpretive research explain social phenomena, or only interpret them? Do interpretive analyses have a small-N problem? In what ways is interpretive research 'grounded'?
Practically, the course considers questions such as the following: What scientific criteria apply for interpretive methods? How do researchers ask the ‘right’ question to the ‘right’ material? What collecting techniques can be used to enhance the quality of the material? What interpretive position should ground the research? What is the unit of analysis? How do researchers organise the material and how do they ‘read’ it? How can they make sense of their interpretations in a transparent, authentic and inclusive way? And how can they draw conclusions from their interpretive analyses?
The course introduces a broad spectrum of interpretive approaches, however the theoretical focus will be on narrative method and discourse analysis. The explicit focus on these two approaches is chosen in order to expose students to methods which put rather different weight on inductive and deductive strategies of interpretation. This is expected to strengthen students’ general knowledge on interpretive methods as well as to give them a solid basis to choose the ‘right’ strategy of interpretation after the course.
After the course students will have a basic knowledge of how to choose between interpretive methods, including insight into hands-on tools that can be used during an interpretive research process. Students will subsequently be able to follow advanced courses in interpretive methods with a more specialised focus on e.g. ethnographic method, grounded theory, narrative method or discourse analysis.
Learning goals:
After the course, the participant should have a basic understanding of how to:
None
Day | Topic | Details |
---|---|---|
1 | Introducing interpretive methods |
|
2 | Interpretive strategies, positions and methods (1) Hands-on strategies for interpretation and analysis (1) |
|
3 | Interpretive strategies, positions and methods (2) Hands-on strategies for interpretation and analysis (2) |
|
4 | Condensing and presenting interpretations |
|
5 | Drawing conclusions from interpretive analyses |
|
Day | Readings |
---|---|
1 | Soss, Joe, 2006: “Talking Our Way to Meaningful Explanations - A Practice Centered View of Interviewing for Interpretive Research”, pp. 127-149 in: (ed. Dvora Yanow and Peregrine Schwartz-Shea) Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Method and the Interpretive Turn, New York: M.E. Sharpe. Wagener, Hendrik: Chapter 1 and 2, pp. 3-23 in: Meaning in Action – Interpretation and Dialogue in Policy Analysis. New York: M.E. Sharp. Weiss, Robert S., 1994, “Respondents: Choosing Them and Recruiting Them” in: Learning from Strangers: The Art and Method of Qualitative Interview Studies. New York: Free Press. PP. 15-37. Yanow, Dvora, 2006 “Thinking interpretively: philosophical presuppositions and the human sciences”, 5-26 in: (ed. Dvora Yanow and Peregrine Schwartz-Shea) Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Method and the Interpretive Turn, New York: M.E. Sharpe. Yanow, Dvora, 2012: “Ways of Knowing”, pp. 24-44 in: Interpretive Research Design. London: Routledge. |
2 | Schaffer, Frederic Charles, 2006: “Ordinary Language Interviewing”, pp. 150- 160 in: (ed. Dvora Yanow and Peregrine Schwartz-Shea) Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Method and the Interpretive Turn, New York: M.E. Sharpe. Mark Bevir, 2006: “How Narratives explain” in: (ed. Dvora Yanow and Peregrine Schwartz-Shea) Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Method and the Interpretive Turn, New York: M.E. Sharpe. PP. 281-290. Thomas, David R, 2006: “A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data”, American Journal of Evaluation vol. 27 no. 2, 237-246. Charmaz, Kathy, 2006: Selected pieces from: Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. London: SAGA publications. |
3 | Foucault, Michel, 1977: “Nietzsche, Genealogy, History” pp. 139-164 in: (Ed. Donald F. Bouchard) Michel Foucault. Language, Counter-Memory, Practice. New York: Cornell University Press. Phillips, Nelson & Cynthia Hardy, 2002, “Discourse Analysis – Investigating Processes of Social Construction” in: Qualitative Research Methods Series 50. London: SAGA Publications. PP. 1-87. |
4 | Miles, Matthew B.,Michael A. Huberman and Johnny Saldana (2014): “Displaying the Data” Chapters 5-10, pp. 105- 272 in: Qualitative Data Analysis. A Methods Sourcebook, 3. edition. London: SAGE. |
5 | Miles, Matthew B. and Michael A. Huberman, 1984: “Drawing Valid Meaning from Qualitative Data: Toward a Shared Craft”, Educational Researcher, Vol. 13, No. 5, pp. 20-30. Lindekilde, Lasse, “Discourse and Frame Analysis: In-depth Analysis of Qualitative Data in Social Movement Research” UNDER PUBLICATION in: D. della Porta (ed.) Methodological Practices in Social Movement Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press. PP. 1-38. Government of Denmark, 2009: A Common and safe future, www.nyidanmark.dk, pp. 4-30 |
None
None
Charmaz, Kathy, 2006: Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. London: SAGA publications.
Government of Denmark, 2009: A Common and safe future, www.nyidanmark.dk
Dvora Yanow, 2006 “Thinking interpretively: philosophical presuppositions and the human sciences,” in: (ed. Dvora Yanow and Peregrine Schwartz-Shea) Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Method and the Interpretive Turn, New York: M.E. Sharpe. PP. 5-27.
Dvora Yanow & Peregrine Schwartz-Shea, 2012: “Ways of Knowing” in: Interpretive Research Design. London: Routledge. PP. 24-44.
Foucault, Michel, 1977: “Nietzsche, Genealogy, History” pp. 139-164 in: (Ed. Donald F. Bouchard) Michel Foucault. Language, Counter-Memory, Practice. New York: Cornell University Press.
Hubert L. Dreyfus and Paul Rabinow, 1983: "Interpretive Analytics," In: Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1983, second edition. PP. 104-125.
Laclau, Ernesto and Chantal Mouffe, 2014: “Beyond the Positivity of the Social: Antagonisms and Hegemony”, Chapter 3, pp. 79-131 in: Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.
Lindekilde, Lasse, “Discourse and Frame Analysis: In-depth Analysis of Qualitative Data in Social Movement Research” UNDER PUBLICATION in: D. della Porta (ed.) Methodological Practices in Social Movement Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press. PP. 1-38.
Mark Bevir, 2006: “How Narratives explain” in: (ed. Dvora Yanow and Peregrine Schwartz-Shea) Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Method and the Interpretive Turn, New York: M.E. Sharpe. PP. 281-290.
Miles, Matthew B.,Michael A. Huberman and Johnny Saldana (2014): “Displaying the Data” Chapters 5-10, pp. 105- 272 in: Qualitative Data Analysis. A Methods Sourcebook, 3. edition. London: SAGE.
Fairclough, Norman, 2003, “Social analysis, discourse analysis, text analysis” pp. 19-61 & “Discourses and representations” pp. 121-156 in: Analyzing Discourse. Textual analysis of social research. London: Routledge.
Phillips, Nelson & Cynthia Hardy, 2002, “Discourse Analysis – Investigating Processes of Social Construction” in: Qualitative Research Methods Series 50. London: SAGA Publications. PP. 1-87.
Riessman, Catherine Kohler, 1993, “Narrative Analysis” in: Qualitative Research Methods Series 30. London: SAGA Publications. PP. 1-70.
Schaffer, Frederic Charles, 2005, “Why don’t Political Scientist Coin More New Terms?” in: Committee on Concepts and Methods, Working Paper Series. PP. 1-34.
Schaffer, Frederic Charles, 2006, “Ordinary Language Interviewing”, Chapter 7 in: (ed. Dvora Yanow and Peregrine Schwartz-Shea) Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Method and the Interpretive Turn, New York: M.E. Sharpe. PP. 150-160.
Soss, Joe, 2006, “Talking Our Way to Meaningful Explanations - A Practice Centered View of Interviewing for Interpretive Research” in: (ed. Dvora Yanow and Peregrine Schwartz-Shea) Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Method and the Interpretive Turn, New York: M.E. Sharpe. PP. 127-149.
Thomas, David R, 2006: “A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data”, American Journal of Evaluation vol. 27 no. 2, 237-246.
Wagener, Hendrik: Chapter 1 and 2, pp. 3-23 in: Meaning in Action – Interpretation and Dialogue in Policy Analysis. New York: M.E. Sharp.
Weiss, Robert S., 1994, “Respondents: Choosing Them and Recruiting Them” in: Learning from Strangers: The Art and Method of Qualitative Interview Studies. New York: Free Press. PP. 15-37.
Summer School:
Winter School: