Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.
Just tap then “Add to Home Screen”
Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.
Just tap then “Add to Home Screen”
Building: Dearing Building, Room: Room B37
Wednesday 09:00 - 17:00 BST (26/04/2017)
Thursday 09:00 - 17:00 BST (27/04/2017)
Friday 09:00 - 12:30 BST (28/04/2017)
Saturday 09:00 - 17:00 BST (29/04/2017)
Recent years witnessed a growing concern about incivil politics in the parliamentary, electoral and media arenas. Ad hominem argumentation, rudeness, hostility and emotionality seem to characterize interactions among politicians and exchanges between politicians, journalists and citizens. Political incivility includes a wide range of verbal behaviour, such as name-calling, mockery, vilification, innuendo, insulting and accusing the opponent, but also nonverbal behaviour, such as refusing to shake hands, gesturing, and refusing to interact. Political incivility violates social norms of politeness and tolerance towards political opponents. Although it may be seen as inherent to the political process, current communication technologies make incivility immediately visible to society as a whole. The practice of incivility is regarded as worrisome by those who consider civil debate a requirement for a well-functioning deliberative democracy. Political incivility increases citizens’ levels of political cynicism, decreases citizens’ levels of political participation, delegitimizes politicians and the political process in the eyes of citizens and weakens their willingness to accept policies that they do not support. At the elite level, political incivility is argued to lead to increased party polarization and less effective government. Although the topic of political incivility has begun to capture scholarly attention, the various studies on forms of incivility in politics remain fragmented in conceptual and analytical approach, and across (sub)disciplines, such as parliamentary studies, (political) psychology, (political) communication, (political) discourse analysis and political theory. We expect that these different forms of incivility are not separate and independent phenomena, but interrelated, possibly even different manifestations of a similar phenomenon. We wish to explore the interconnections and latent similarities. This workshop aims to bring together a group of international scholars from various (sub)disciplines to stimulate the study of political incivility in all its facets and in particular in a non-U.S. context.
Title | Details |
---|---|
Testing the Effects of Two-Dimensional Conflict on Legislative Productivity | View Paper Details |
Signaling Incivility: The Role of Speaker, Substance and Tone | View Paper Details |
Uncivil Politicians on TV: The Impact of Impolite Behavior on Political Attitudes | View Paper Details |
Negativity in Day-to-Day Politics. Examining Politicians Who Play the Attack Game | View Paper Details |
Voters’ Emotional Response to Negative Campaign Messages: The Role of Incivility | View Paper Details |
Civility and Incivility at Prime Minister’s Questions (PMQs) in the British House of Commons | View Paper Details |
Talking Politics Online: Is Social Media Making Political Debates More Extreme? | View Paper Details |
Rude by Nature? The Impact of Political Cartoons on the Perception of Politicians | View Paper Details |
Interactional Forms of Political Negativism in the Broadcasted Political Interviews of the Campaign for the Italian Political Elections of 2013 | View Paper Details |
The Importance of Contempt in Election Campaigns | View Paper Details |
Disagreeing or being Disagreeable? Examining the Relative Effects of Elite Incivility and Ideological Polarization on Mass Level Attitudes | View Paper Details |
Caught in the Crossfire. A Comparative Investigation into Televised Incivility and Deliberative Quality of the Election Debates in the United Kingdom, Germany, the Netherlands and Belgium | View Paper Details |
The Impact of Civility on Campaign Tone Perceptions | View Paper Details |
Incivility in Austrian Parliamentary Debates: A Supervised Sentiment Analysis of Parliamentary Speeches | View Paper Details |
Anti-Democratic Discourse: Meaning and Measurement | View Paper Details |
Disgrace, Dishonour and Shame: The Rise of Extreme Rhetoric in Polish Parliament. | View Paper Details |
Abusive Democracy: The Trolling of UK MPs on Twitter | View Paper Details |