ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

Migrant Workers, Union Citizens and Social Assistance: From Rules to Reality

Citizenship
European Union
Migration
Social Policy
Welfare State
Courts
Jurisprudence
P246
Michael Blauberger
Universität Salzburg
Juan Antonio Mayoral
Carlos III-Juan March Institute of Social Sciences – IC3JM

Building: Faculty of Social Sciences, Floor: 1, Room: FS115

Friday 17:40 - 19:20 CEST (09/09/2016)

Abstract

The access of migrant workers and Union citizens to public financial support in their host state is politically sensitive. EU rules and Court of Justice decisions are often portrayed as allowing migrants to live parasitically, and threatening to undermine national welfare state institutions. Occasional judgments in which the Court takes a more restrictive approach are portrayed as showing its reluctant sensitivity to national concerns. Yet a more nuanced and empirical look at how Member States actually respond both to judgments of the Court, and to individual migrants who apply for public support, shows that the nexus between EU law and national practice is more complex and multi-facetted. On the one hand, local institutional factors, administrative difficulties in dealing with uncertain law, and a lack of clear central government guidance may be just as important in determining state responses as the details of EU law. On the other hand, the substance of EU law cannot be ignored, as it may stimulate powerful national responses, often going beyond mere compliance or denial. Contained or defensive compliance can lead to policy reshaping which is potentially a powerful form of Europeanisation precisely because state initiative plays a central role. The theme of this panel is the passage from case law to national practice concerning migrant access to benefits. Neither the substantive rules, nor the local institutional reality can be ignored in this story: there is no simple choice between law or politics to be made. Behaviour is changed and shaped by a composite of influences in which questions of discretion, uncertainty, and local preference mediate powerfully the formal law.

Title Details
European Social Union – For Whom? View Paper Details
Solving individual conflicts, creating systemic uncertainties View Paper Details
Enter at your own Risk. How EU Member States Administer the Free Movement of EU Citizens View Paper Details
Enforcer of European Social Rights or Defender of National Welfare Systems? The National Judiciary and its Role in the Europeanisation of Welfare Rights View Paper Details