Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.
Just tap then “Add to Home Screen”
Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.
Just tap then “Add to Home Screen”
In political science after WW II a textbook definition of ‘parliamentarism’ exclusively as a type of regime based on the government’s responsibility to the parliament has been taken for granted. Older conceptualisations on parliamentary politics as ‘government by discussion’, contemporary studies of parliamentary rhetoric and discourse in the humanities as well as the experiences of parliamentarians emphasise, however, rather other dimensions of the concept. Among them we could mention for example the discussions of key parliament-constitutive concepts such as (parliamentary) deliberation, representation, responsibility and sovereignty, or of parliamentary freedoms (free speech, free mandate, free elections, freedom from arrest). To conceptual debates around parliamentarism we can further include the relationship of parliamentary debate with other forms of deliberative rhetoric or the disputes on the changes of the intra-parliamentary procedural vocabulary and their political significance, for in relation to the increasing scarcity of parliamentary time.
Title | Details |
---|---|
Debating Parliamentarism and Partisanship in Weimar: Parliamentary Representation and Mass Parties in the Political Theory of Carl Schmitt and Gerhard Leibholz | View Paper Details |
The Parliament as a Model for Debate – Learning and Adoption of European Parliamentary Procedures in Finland | View Paper Details |
That Her Majesty’s Ministers are Unworthy of the Confidence of the Country: Rhetoric and Agenda-Setting in the Nineteenth-Century British Parliamentary Culture of Debate | View Paper Details |
Parliamentary Immunity: Comparative Conceptual Analysis in Romania and France | View Paper Details |
The Parliamentary Government as a Trope | View Paper Details |