ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

Can Participatory Reforms Save Representative Democracy?

Participation
Political theory
WS05
Kimmo Grönlund
Åbo Akademi
Brigitte Geißel
Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt

Despite a fundamental triumph of democracy in Europe, worrying tendencies in contemporary democratic systems give rise to concern. Citizens have become more critical of democratic institutions and political actors, such as political parties, politicians and parliaments. The most common way of participating – voting at elections – has declined in most democracies since the 1970s and the decline has been particularly marked in former communist countries in Eastern and Central Europe since the 1990s (Solijonov 2016). In addition, the share of citizens belonging to political parties has waned dramatically (Kölln 2014). More recently, the increased attraction of anti-establishment policies or politicians, such as the British referendum on leaving the European Union, “Brexit” in June 2016 and the American presidential election with the victory of the politically inexperienced Donald J. Trump in November 2016 have shocked both traditional political elites and political scientists alike. The demands from populist parties in Europe to “take back control from the EU” and enforce strict immigration policies have been increasingly successful. Even in the Nordic countries, commonly known for their generous welfare states and high levels of social and political trust, populist-nationalist parties have gained between 13 (Sweden 2014) and 21 per cent (Denmark 2015) of the popular vote. Democracy is also threatened by authoritarian tendencies in countries such as Russia and Turkey, and within the EU in incumbent governments in Hungary and Poland. The Syrian civil war has presented itself as a large number of refugees in Europe, pushing many democratic states in flux. Especially right-wing populist parties exploit the migrants, together with the terrorist attacks in the heart of Europe in their hard-line policies. Liberal democracies, which are based on basic values such as electoral integrity, freedom, equality and diversity, are under crossfire. Accordingly, the “crisis of democracy”, “the end of representative politics” (Tormey 2015), and even the “death of democracy” (Keane 2009) have been declared. Democratic institutions, developed in the 19th and 20th centuries, seem to be somewhat out of touch with the popular demands in current societies. The ‘old’ representative mechanisms are challenged through denunciations of misrepresentation and decreasing voter turnout, an increasing political mistrust and sudden, non-predicted and populist electoral outcomes – to mention just a few. The elitist solution seems to be that ordinary people cannot be trusted with policy choices (Brexit). Nevertheless, a democratic system cannot survive without a link between the popular will and the policies of the government. Thus, the democratic solution to the profound problems of contemporary democracies cannot be less democracy. At the same time, we are experiencing a boom of new institutions and procedures fostering the involvement of citizens and civil society in order to complement representative democracy - e.g. referenda or dialogue-oriented citizen assemblies and deliberative mini-publics (e.g. Geissel & Newton 2012; Geißel & Joas 2013, Grönlund, Bächtiger & Setälä 2014, Reuchamps & Suiter 2016). Political will-formation and decision-making are no longer limited to elected bodies of representatives, but can be described as multi-faceted procedures. This workshop will focus on these fundamental transformations of democracy, assess current developments, and innovate scenarios for the future of democracy. We are convinced that democracy is in a “process of transition from one type to another“ and that it will “survive, but only by changing” (Schmitter 2015: 35, 32). Debates about the future of democracy are currently in vogue (e.g. Alonso et al 2011). Yet, democratic scenarios, embedded in both normative and empirical research, are rare. This workshop aims at filling this gap and at developing tools through which representative government can be democratised. The focus is in implementable, theoretically sound solutions, which can combine ideas from both deliberative and participatory democracy with representative democracy. The topic has not been covered in the past two years in the ECPR Joint Sessions. However, the workshop will continue a vivid ongoing discussion within the Standing Group on ‘Democratic Innovations’ at the ECPR. The proposers are the funding members and first Convenors of the Standing Group. Kimmo Grönlund is still Convenor, and Brigitte Geissel is member of the Steering Committee. Relation to existing research With few exceptions, published in recent years, the case study approach looking at one innovation in one country at one level (local or national) and in one policy field is still prevailing. In these case studies, each innovation is assessed within its own setting and according to its own goals. Recently some scholars try a more systematic access, e.g. Geißel & Joas 2013 or Grönlund, Bächtiger & Setälä 2014. However, many studies focus on the Americas – for example the British Columbia Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform (Canada), Participatory Budgeting in Porto Alegra (Brasil), or policing in Chicago (USA). Systematic collaboration of researchers in this field is missing– especially in Europe. References Alonso, Sonia/Keane, John/Merkel, Wolfgang (eds.) (2011). The Future of Representative Democracy, Cambridge University Press. Geißel, Brigitte/Joas, Marko (eds.) (2013). Participatory Democratic Innovations in Europe, Barbara Budrich Verlag. Geissel, Brigitte/Newton, Kenneth (eds.) (2012). Evaluating Democratic Innovations - Curing the Democratic Malaise?, Routledge. Grönlund, Kimmo; Bächtiger, André & Setälä, Maija (eds.) (2014). Deliberative Mini-Publics – Involving Citizens in the Democratic Process. Colchester: the ECPR Press. Keane, John (2009). The Life and Death of Democracy, Simon and Schuster Publisher. Solijonov, Abdurashid. (2016). Voter Turnout Trends around the World. IDEA, International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. Stockholm. Kölln, Ann-Kristin. (2014). Party decline and response The effects of membership decline on party organisations in Western Europe, 1960-2010. Zutphen: CPI Wöhrmann Print Service Reuchamps, Min & Suiter, Jane (eds.) (2016). Constitutional Deliberative Democracy in Europe. Colchester: ECPR Press. Schmitter, Philippe C. (2015). Crisis and Transition, But Not Decline, in: Journal of Democracy 26(1), 2-44. Tormey, Simon (2015): The end of representative democracy, Polity Press, Cambridge UK.

Potential Participants The workshop aims to attract a variety of participants. It will attract advanced students as well as young members of the profession and well-established professors, fellows with theoretical as well as empirical focus, researchers from Northern and Southern as well as from Eastern and Western Europe. Previous conferences on similar topics have already demonstrated (e.g. sections of Standing Group ‘Democratic Innovations’ at ECPR General Conferences and Joint Sessions) that this diversity can be achieved and is an asset. Several colleagues have already expressed their interest to participate in the workshop. However, we will ensure that the workshop is open for new fellows and aspects, especially for fellows from the new EU-member states. Type of papers We welcome a mixture of papers: empirical work as well as theoretical and conceptual papers. Especially theory-driven empirical papers with a comparative approach are encouraged.

Title Details
What is on the Table? Explaining the Types of Policies Subjected to Referendums in Europe View Paper Details
Measuring Epistemic Deliberation of Difficult Subjects: The Case of Abortion Provision in Ireland View Paper Details
Why do they keep participating?: Reviewing participatory motivations in multilevel advisory councils View Paper Details
Structured Dialogue: A Democratic Innovation in the Youth Field View Paper Details
Cure for Democratic Malaise or Illness Accelerator? Public Discourses on Direct Democracy in Germany View Paper Details
More or Less Equality? National Referendums in Europe from 1990 to 2015 View Paper Details
Integrating Democratic Innovations into Representative Democracy: How Participatory Processes can Address the Challenges of Social Legitimacy, Institutional Sustainability and Policy Effectiveness View Paper Details
How do Citizens React to Democratic Innovations they were not Involved in? View Paper Details
Participatory Budgeting in France: Opening Local Budgets or Lipservice? View Paper Details
Designing Democratic Innovation for the Real World: Lessons from the Ambitious NHS Citizen Initiative View Paper Details
A Matter of Life or Death: A Survey Experiment on Perceived Legitimacy View Paper Details
Participatory Reforms to Elections: Findings of a Field-Experiment testing Enhanced Policy Voting (EPV) View Paper Details
Measuring the Compatibility of Democratic Innovations with Representative Democracy View Paper Details
Claims of Representation in Democratic Innovations View Paper Details
How Competent Should Voters be in Referendum Processes? The Role of Citizens in Hybrid Democratic Systems View Paper Details
Citizen Agency in Democratic Reform: Towards Substantive and Sustainable Democratic Innovation View Paper Details
Reforming Democracy in Disconnected Times: A Deliberative Systems Approach View Paper Details
On Measuring Mass Deliberative Quality: Preliminary Results of a Novel, Electronic Comparative Project View Paper Details
The Democratic Quality and Legitimacy of Local Referendums: The Case of the Norwegian Municipal Reform View Paper Details
Is there an Economic Vote in Referendums? View Paper Details
Democratic Innovations and the Consolidation of Democracy in Latin America. A Comparative Analytical Framework and Empirical Application to Colombia, Ecuador and Brazil View Paper Details
The Functions of Democratic Innovations from a Citizen Perspective View Paper Details