Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.
Just tap then “Add to Home Screen”
Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.
Just tap then “Add to Home Screen”
Building: VMP 9, Floor: 2, Room: 27
Friday 14:00 - 15:40 CEST (24/08/2018)
Whether (and to what extent) courts are politicized by political actors or the judges themselves is one of the traditional key questions of political research on courts. This panel examines this question with regard to the appointment of judges, and the judges' preferences and behaviour. Papers deal with national judges’ reluctance to participate in the preliminary ruling procedure before the Court of Justice of the European Union, the judicial-elected branch relations in Paraguay, judicial behavior of General Court judges in EU competition law cases, the impact of political corruption on government attacks on the judiciary, and the selection of judges on the basis of policy preferences or performance indicators.
Title | Details |
---|---|
Will Do? Selecting Judges on the Basis of Policy Preferences or Performance Indicators. | View Paper Details |
“To Submit or Not to Submit – That is the (Preliminary) Question”: Exploring National Judges’ Reluctance to Participate in the Preliminary Ruling procedure | View Paper Details |
Crowdsourcing the Attitudinal Model: Judicial Behavior of General Court Judges in EU Competition Law Cases | View Paper Details |
Explaining Government Attacks on the Judiciary: The Conditional Impact of Political Corruption | View Paper Details |
Adaptive Informal Institutions Governing Judicial-Elected Branch Relations in Paraguay | View Paper Details |