Comparative Perspectives on Public Participation as a Tool of Regulatory Governance

Abstract

In recent years, public participation has become a much-used tool of regulatory governance. In infrastructure planning, in regulatory standard-setting, or in the formulation of public policy, administrative and political actors regularly consult the public. Consequently, there is a rich literature on consultation procedures, e.g. on consultations by the European Union (Bunea and Thomson, 2015; Klüver, 2013; Rasmussen and Carroll, 2014), the notice-and-comment procedure in US administrative law (Balla, 2015; Yackee, 2006), or similar procedures in other countries like the UK (Lodge and Wegrich, 2015; Maciejewski Scheer and Höppner, 2010; Upham et al., 2011) or Germany (Fink and Ruffing, forthcoming). However, there is much less comparative research that compares public participation on a cross-national level (for notable exceptions see (Huxley et al., 2016; Rasmussen, 2015)), although public participation often adresses similar policy questions. The panel invites empirical contributions that address this comparative dimension of public participation. Basically, we want to put public participation research on a more universal footing by asking: What scope conditions (e.g. administrative traditions, type of democracy, political culture) influence the design, use, and impact of public participation procedures?

Title	Details
Measuring the Democratic Qualities of Regulatory Agencies ꟷ Index Development and Illustration	View Paper Details
Passing on the Hot Potato? An Exploration into the Commission’s Proclivity to Outsource the Analysis of the Collected Input from Public Consultations	View Paper Details
From the ‘Responsible’ to the ‘Responsive’ Regulatory State? Citizen Engagement, Parliamentary Oversight and the Politicisation of Regulation	View Paper Details
Stakeholder Engagement and Regulatory Responsiveness: Pretty on Paper, but What Happens on the Ground?	View Paper Details