This paper reviews the current state of the art of statebuilding theory, including classical state-formation theory, liberal peace theory, nation and peacebuilding theory and postcolonial theory. Although the main theories were built as lenses for statebuilding analysis, they are confronted with shortcomings when applied to the field. The paper applies the current theories to the case study of Kosovo as it has presented itself in a fieldwork encompassing 70 interviews with local and international stakeholders. It points out the advantages and shortcomings of each theory and highlights the interactions that fall outside their scope. In the context of Kosovo, this includes amongst others the existence of networks of internationals and locals, which create dependencies across different areas of post-conflict politics.
