ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

Decentralisation, Clientelism and Social Protection Programs: A Study of India’s MGNREGA

Comparative Politics
Development
Governance
Local Government
Political Economy
Social Policy
Mixed Methods
Policy Implementation

Abstract

Does decentralisation promote clientelism? If yes, through which mechanisms? We answer these questions through an analysis of India’s (and the world’s) largest workfare programme, the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), in two Indian states: Rajasthan and Andhra Pradesh. The two states adopted radically different implementation models: Rajasthan’s decentralised one stands in contrast with Andhra Pradesh’s centralised and bureaucracy-led model. Using a mixed method approach, we find find that in both states local implementers have the incentives to distribute MGNREGA work in a clientelistic fashion. However, in the Rajasthan’s model, these incentives are stronger, because of the decentralised implementation model. Accordingly, our quantitative evidence shows that clientelism is more serious a problem in Rajasthan than in AP. India; MGNREGA; clientelism; incentives; implementation; decentralization; politics.