ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

Gendered candidate selection in sectarian countries: the Case of Lebanon.

Ethnic Conflict
Gender
Institutions
Party Manifestos
Political Parties
Representation
Fatimah Saadi
Universitat Pompeu Fabra
Fatimah Saadi
Universitat Pompeu Fabra

Abstract

The paper’s key contribution is to identify the gaps and provide new theoretical and empirical insights on the gendered dynamics of inclusion and exclusion underpinning sectarian polities, which requires putting the post-conflict and power-sharing, candidate selection, and feminist institutionalism literatures into dialogue. It focuses on the micro-foundations of a sectarian-based system as a gendered political institution to identify mechanisms at work within parties, posing the following question: How do gendered (formal and informal) rules of candidate selection at the party level interplay with the (formal and informal rules) of sectarian-based systems? By deploying a feminist institutional analysis to sectarian power-sharing systems such as the Lebanese system, this paper investigates central questions of candidate selection and party politics scholarship in sectarian polities. Delving into how parties and institutional arrangements perpetuate male dominance in sectarian, divided polities, the paper expands feminist institutionalist studies on women’s political representation in countries where institutions are built around the role of the male leader as the protector of the sect.