ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

Internal gender equality of International Organizations - role models or hypocrites?

European Union
Gender
Governance
Institutions
UN
Council of Europe
Nawal Badurova
Anglo-American University
Brooklyn Cowen-Ferenc
Anglo-American University
Hannah Schermer
Anglo-American University
Nawal Badurova
Anglo-American University
Brooklyn Cowen-Ferenc
Anglo-American University
Hannah Schermer
Anglo-American University

Abstract

International organizations led by the UN, the Council of Europe (CoE) and the EU are at the forefront of promoting gender equality among their member states. Such targets are set in their respective binding and non-binding acquis (long-term programs, recommendations and resolutions, directives and treaties), which push member states to implement gender-positive measures with the aim of achieving at least 40% representation of women, generally considered as the threshold for gender equality. However, their own internal gender equality rules and procedures are often not transparent and lack external monitoring and sanctioning mechanisms. All three organizations have set ambitious internal targets, with both the UN and the COE aiming to achieve gender equality at all staff levels by 2028 and 2023 (UN, 2017; COE, 2018). The EU has set the goal of achieving gender balance in all decision-making positions by 2025. Both the UN and the EU use quotas to achieve these goals, especially in higher decision-making positions (European Commission, 2020). However, despite significant progress, these organizations have yet to achieve gender equality, and decision-making in organizations is still dominated by men, who occupy around 70% of high level leadership positions. Such a situation points to existing glass ceilings (Haack, 2014) and direct and indirect forms of discrimination (Powell & Graves, 2018; Kampen & Grote, 2019). The aim of this paper is to evaluate the effectiveness of internal gender equality methods and to identify gaps and areas for improvement based on a comparative analysis of existing internal rules and practices in the UN, CoE and EU. In the last decade, several partial studies have already been done in this area (EK 2014; UN Women; Maier & Wroblewski, 2018; Vargas 2019; Kenny, 2019; Müller & Tömmel, 2022), but more comprehensive and comparative research is still lacking. The presented research tries to at least partially fill this gap and thus contribute to the existing literature on female leadership in international organizations. Based on the theory of organizational effectiveness, symbolic and substantive representation, this study also explains the motives for promoting gender equality within international organizations that strive to increase their reputation, credibility and legitimacy.