American Universities were contributing great role in shaping leaderships and development. There work regarding the precious part of their side can give us the concept of Democracy for all. The historical outlook of that which was mentioned by Mark R. Nemec, Ann Arbor in their book “Ivory Towers and Nationalist Minds: Universities, and Benjamin I. Page and Marshall M. Bouton, “The Foreign Policy Disconnect: What Americans Want from Our Leaders but Don’t Get”, shows Leadership, and the Development of the American State” peculiarly and prominently by Association of American Universities (AAU) which awarded the legitimacy to the situation arises in favor of USA. Stress on public policy in university education, arguing that all political science departments should include public policy in the curriculum. Universities continue to be agenda setting institutions by defining the importance of social and political issues Foreign issues which was may argued that were not under the circumstances according to public opinion. All within the general domain of foreign policy that could not found evidence of prevalent horizontally constrained foreign policy belief system, whereby attitudes regarding national security and trade. Authors analyze surveys by Chicago Council of Foreign Relations (CCFR) and public cares about numerous foreign policies. On other hand authors compare mass and elite attitude across identical issue dimensions. Even some weakest part of the books this begs the question of whether U.S. foreign policy would look very different if elites were more responsive to the public. And the weightier discussion of policy implications.
