ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

Who counts as European? A Conjoint Experiment on Competing Conceptions of Europeanness

Nationalism
Political Psychology
Identity
Public Opinion
Survey Experiments
Isabela Zeberio Aguerrevere
University of Amsterdam
Isabela Zeberio Aguerrevere
University of Amsterdam
Theresa Kuhn
University of Amsterdam

To access full paper downloads, participants are encouraged to install the official Event App, available on the App Store.


Abstract

Who counts as European? While extensive research examines whether citizens identify as European, we know surprisingly little about the boundaries of European identity, the criteria EU citizens use to define group membership. This gap matters because the content of identity shapes not only who feels included in the community but also political attitudes toward migration, integration, and EU enlargement. European identity faces intensifying politicization and contestation, with competing visions actively reshaping how citizens understand who belongs. The EU's inclusive "United in diversity" ideal now confronts far-right civilizationist discourse that emphasizes whiteness and Christianity as defining features of Europeanness. Most research assumes citizens embrace either civic or ethnocultural definitions of European identity. However, this binary framework increasingly appears insufficient as most people combine elements from both dimensions, and the framework cannot explain how citizens evaluate the specific attribute combinations they encounter in political debate and everyday life. We move beyond the civic/ethnic dichotomy to investigate which combinations of identity markers Europeans use to define group boundaries. Using conjoint experiments with a click-to-reveal design, we examine how Europeans evaluate hypothetical individuals across nine attributes, including birthplace, family background, language, place of residence, religion, legal status, democratic values, European feeling, and employment status. Respondents must actively select which attributes to reveal before making judgments, but can only reveal a limited number. This constraint forces them to make trade-offs about which information they truly find important for determining whom they perceive as European. We also track how revealed attributes shape subsequent information-seeking. This design allows us to capture both the cognitive processes underlying boundary-making and the characteristics that ultimately inform the decision to accept someone as a European.