ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

Why some Eurosceptic parties capitalise on EU issue voting, whereas others fail to do so

Euroscepticism
Mobilisation
Survey Research
Voting Behaviour
Luca Carrieri
Sapienza University of Rome
Luca Carrieri
Sapienza University of Rome
Davide Angelucci
LUISS University
Nicolò Conti
Sapienza University of Rome

To access full paper downloads, participants are encouraged to install the official Event App, available on the App Store.


Abstract

Scholarship has long documented growing signs of declining public support for the EU, most visibly through rising anti-EU sentiment and Eurosceptic voting. At the same time, as European integration has shifted from a “sleeping giant” to a salient and contested political issue, parties across the ideological spectrum have increasingly been able to mobilise voters by articulating their EU positions more forcefully. By emphasising their stances on Europe, these parties have become more effective at attracting supporters whose preferences align with their own. In the paper, through a longitudinal analysis in the EU member states, we show that EU issue voting has increasingly shaped party support and citizens’ electoral preferences, becoming a central feature of party competition. Parties gain or lose support depending on how closely their EU positions align with those of voters. This effect is particularly strong when all key components of EU politicisation are present—namely heightened EU salience, a broader range of actors expressing diverse EU positions, and increased polarisation on EU matters. Contrary to the established literature on Eurosceptic mobilisation, we show the growing importance of pro-EU voting. Over time, party pro-EU salience and pro-integration positions have become electorally advantageous, whereas Eurosceptic stances—after years of successful mobilisation—have started to backfire. In the wake of a series of overlapping crises that have affected the EU in recent decades, a dynamic of pro-EU issue voting has emerged and persisted, sustaining a “Europhile momentum” that began with Brexit and continues today. As a result, Europhile parties have become more competitive and increasingly capable of securing electoral gains on the EU dimension. However, not all forms of Euroscepticism have lost their appeal. We show that some radical or hard-line Eurosceptic positions continue to mobilise segments of the electorate. We therefore investigate why some Eurosceptic parties continue to capitalise on EU issue voting while others do not, and we offer a comprehensive account of party–voter congruence on Euroscepticism and its electoral consequences across Europe.