From Private Concerns to Public Acts of Resistance
Conflict
Democracy
Democratisation
Critical Theory
Internet
Big Data
Capitalism
To access full paper downloads, participants are encouraged to install the official Event App, available on the App Store.
Abstract
People look at younger generations filled with either admiration or confusion, as if they
represent a collective peculiarity. A lost generation, drifting under the sway of modern
technology. Instead of entertaining the idea they might have some insight to provide, people
look with a perspective reminiscing the past. The values that younger generations at times
embody — like rest, autonomy, meaning, and sustainability — are not only put away as
unrealistic, but also as a disruption. As if they disrupt the carefully oiled work processes of the
‘adult world’.
Today's youth bring private interests into the public sphere. But why is that
happening? We live in times of increasing misinformation and fragmentation of knowledge,
where echo chambers and political polarization fuel widespread disagreement and doubt.
Therein we find a widespread belief in the contingency of information, ethics, and the
political. It is getting increasingly more difficult to talk about a shared and hegemonic ethos in
society, either positively or negatively. Consequently, efficient, collective action feels like a
distant dream. We are left with growing dissatisfaction — or worse, apathy — toward the way
things are, and a powerlessness in changing it.
We have only become more private and individualistic in our approach. There is a
growing focus on the self, coupled with a distrust in traditional epistemic authorities. These
shifts place greater emphasis on the use of technologies such as social media, which are no
longer just a space for voicing private concerns, but are increasingly viewed as the place
where public transformation occurs. However, the same technology is also shaped and
influenced by economic and political interests.
Through finding inspiration in the diverse philosophies of Henry David Thoreau,
Michel Foucault, and Soren Kierkegaard, I aim to make way for a type of resistance. I aim to
answer the question of how can one navigate an ethics, or else foster an ethos, within modern
society, a place of fragmentation, apathy, and private affairs. A resistance, I argue, that seeks
its place outside the system’s boundaries.