ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

Countering the Far Right: What Responses Really Work, When, and Why?

Democracy
Extremism
Political Parties
Léonie de Jonge
Universität Tübingen
Léonie de Jonge
Universität Tübingen
Anna-Sophie Heinze
University of Trier

To access full paper downloads, participants are encouraged to install the official Event App, available on the App Store.


Abstract

The rise and persistence of far-right actors across Europe have prompted a growing debate about what constitutes an effective response. Yet, despite the expanding literature on far-right parties and mainstream party strategies, we still lack a systematic understanding of what works, when, and why in countering the far right. This paper develops a comparative framework for assessing the effectiveness of responses across different contexts, actors, and arenas. We argue that effectiveness cannot be narrowly defined in electoral terms – such as temporarily reducing far-right vote shares – but must also encompass broader democratic outcomes, including preventing normalisation, sustaining liberal-democratic norms, and improving citizens’ satisfaction with democracy. Building on research on responsiveness and party competition, we conceptualise effectiveness along three dimensions: (1) actors (political parties, media, civil society); (2) arenas (parliament, party competition, government, extra-parliamentary), and (3) timing (proactive versus reactive). This multidimensional approach allows us to identify the conditions under which particular responses – such as a cordon sanitaire, policy adaptation, or government inclusion – either succeed or backfire. Empirically, the paper employs a most-similar-systems design comparing Austria, Germany, the Netherlands, and Wallonia. These cases capture variation in far-right strength, government participation, and societal entrenchment – from rapid breakthroughs (Netherlands), to enduring far-right power (Austria), to persistent yet constrained movements (Germany), and cases of resilience without far-right success (Wallonia). Our findings suggest that no single actor or strategy suffices: effective countering of the far right requires layered responses across institutions and society, combining proactive norm defence with credible policy alternatives. In short, confronting the far right is a multi-arena, multi-actor challenge – and understanding how timing, alliances, and arenas interact is key to ‘turning the tide’.