ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

Pirate Parties and Citizen–Representative Platforms

Cyber Politics
Democratisation
Political Participation
Political Parties
Agenda-Setting
Communication
Public Opinion
Kim Graves
Université catholique de Lille
Kim Graves
Université catholique de Lille
Michal Malý
Charles University

To access full paper downloads, participants are encouraged to install the official Event App, available on the App Store.


Abstract

The literature on digital political parties has overwhelmingly focused on intra-party democracy, examining how digital tools reshape internal decision-making, leadership selection, candidate nomination, and member participation. While these studies have generated important insights into the organisational consequences of digitalisation, they leave largely unexplored a distinct set of platforms that operate outside intra-party democracy and instead mediate the relationship between citizens and elected representatives. This article addresses this gap by analysing digitally mediated platforms developed within the Pirate Parties that enable citizens to submit questions or proposals directly to mandated representatives and to observe how these inputs are processed within parliamentary work. Unlike platforms such as LiquidFeedback, which redistribute power within party organisations, these tools are designed to enhance post-electoral responsiveness by creating additional channels of interaction between citizens and representatives. Empirically, the article examines three platforms that form a coherent chain of experimentation: OpenAntrag, used by German Pirate Party representatives in German local and regional parliaments (2012–2018), FRO.LU, operated by the Luxembourg Pirate Party at the national parliamentary level since 2019, and OpenRequest, briefly deployed at the European level by the European Pirate Party (2023–2024). The analysis of the platforms is supplemented with data on the submitted proposals and interviews with developers and parliamentary staff responsible. The analysis focuses on inclusiveness, responsiveness, and effectiveness, examining who can participate, how citizen inputs are processed, how representatives respond, and how quickly submissions are translated into parliamentary questions or proposals. By shifting attention from internal party democracy to citizen–representative interaction, the article contributes to debates on digital democratic affordances and offers a systematic analysis of platforms that seek to repair representative linkages in contemporary party politics.