ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

Territorial Group Appeals in a Supranational Parliament: Institutional Empowerment and the Rescaling of Parliamentary Focus in the European Parliament (1994–2024)

Elites
Quantitative
Communication
European Parliament
Jeremy Dodeigne
University of Namur
Jeremy Dodeigne
University of Namur

To access full paper downloads, participants are encouraged to install the official Event App, available on the App Store.


Abstract

The European Parliament (EP), a central institution of the European Union’s multilevel democracy, confronts a core representational dilemma: how Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) articulate the interests of social groups they represent while operating between national electorates and a supranational legislature. Building on the growing literature on group appeals – defined as explicit references that link political actors to specific categories of people – this article examines how MEPs mobilize group appeals in their parliamentary activity. In a supranational setting, group appeals serve not only as instruments of vote seeking and representative claim-making, but also as mechanisms through which MEPs signal their position within overlapping territorial and institutional arenas. We argue that group appeals by MEPs are inherently territorialized: when appealing to social, economic, or cultural groups, legislators simultaneously locate these groups at different territorial scales, ranging from local and national constituencies to European-wide publics. The EP thus provides a unique context to study how institutional empowerment and deepening integration have been reshaping the territorial scope of group-based representation. We expect that this institutional evolution shifted MEPs’ territorial group appeals from national to European focus – albeit with some variations according to party group affiliations (Eurosceptics versus mainstream EPGs) as well as member states’ membership and power role (periphery versus central countries). Empirically, the article introduces a novel longitudinal measurement of MEPs’ group appeals with a specific focus on their territorial group appeals scope between 1994 and 2024. Using named entity recognition processing for territorial focus and transformer-based models for mention of group appeals, we classify 187,617 parliamentary questions according to both the type of group mentioned and the territorial level at which these groups are located.