Participation, Deliberation, and Democratic Resilience: Democratic Innovations in Contemporary Italy

This paper develops a theoretical account of how democratic innovations interact with social movements to either strengthen or erode democratic resilience in contested and constrained contexts. Focusing on Italy as a central case—characterized by fluctuating trust, episodic polarization, and recurrent tensions between institutional design and civic mobilization—the paper clarifies the conceptual relationship between participation and deliberation and shows why their frequent conflation obscures core mechanisms of resilience. The argument proceeds in two steps. First, I propose a framework distinguishing institutionalization logics (that prioritize stability, routinization, and policy uptake) from movement logics (that prioritize autonomy, agenda-setting, and counter public formation). I envisage the conditions under which democratic innovations—citizens’ assemblies, participatory budgeting, and hybrid digital forums—mediate these logics as complementary rather than antagonistic. Second, I identify failure modes—co-optation, participation washing, and design drift—through which innovations jeopardize legitimacy and depolarizing potential, especially when civic space narrows or administrative constraints intensify. Italy anchors the analysis and illustrates how design choices, facilitation practices, and communication strategies can recalibrate the innovation–movement nexus. By disentangling participation from deliberation and specifying the mechanisms linking innovations to resilience, the paper contributes a portable conceptual toolkit for assessing democratic repair in non ideal conditions.