The Hybrid Sphere: Voluntary and Community-Based Care in Three European Welfare States
Institutions
Social Policy
Social Welfare
Welfare State
Political Sociology
Qualitative Comparative Analysis
NGOs
Solidarity
To access full paper downloads, participants are encouraged to install the official Event App, available on the App Store.
Abstract
European welfare states are increasingly relying on voluntary and community-based
organisations to meet the expanding social and elderly care needs. Yet existing scholarship
continues to model welfare provision primarily through the state-market-family triad. This paper
reconceptualises the community sphere as an inherently hybrid institutional space and argues that
community organisations occupy a structurally necessary “in-between” position, absorbing
responsibilities that neither state, market, nor family fully assume.
Building on historical institutionalism and organisational sociology, the analysis develops
the welfare pyramid, a conceptual model that visualises how care organisations position
themselves in relation to the state, market, family, and community. Through analytic induction,
this paper traces three historical traditions of community care: faith-based, class-based, and
identity-based, showing how each of them produced distinct hybrid organisational forms shaped
by religious authority, worker mutualism, or pillarised civic structures. The article argues that
even though institutional environments transform, these legacies continue to structure
contemporary care organisations.
The empirical analysis examines three cases: Bonifraterska Fundacja Dobroczynna in
Poland, Vivium Zorggroep in the Netherlands, and Link Age Southwark in the UK. Drawing on
organisational documents, financing structures, and governance arrangements, the study
illustrates how each organisation reproduces a distinct variant of hybridity: a subsidiarity-driven
religious hybrid in Poland, a professionalised public-market hybrid in the Netherlands, and a
civic-philanthropic hybrid in the UK. These configurations reveal how contemporary voluntary
care remains institutionally anchored, normatively grounded, and financially patterned.