ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

Social and Psychological Factors of Mass Support for Authoritarianism

Political Participation
Political Psychology

P024

Anil Kahvecioglu

Bilkent University

Samuel Greene

King's College London

Tuesday 08:00 – Friday 17:00 (07/04/2026 – 10/04/2026)
This Workshop explores the social and psychological foundations of mass support for autocrats across regime types. Drawing on political psychology, comparative politics, and sociology, it explores how psychological orientations, emotions, and social and political identities shape citizens’ engagement with authoritarian politics. The goal is to foster cross-disciplinary dialogue, sharpen conceptual clarity, and advance empirical insights into autocratic appeal. Ultimately, the Workshop seeks to build a collaborative research agenda that pushes theoretical innovation and deepens understanding of the drivers of autocratisation worldwide.
Support for authoritarianism is a global concern shaped by intertwined social, political, and economic dynamics. While there is no simple solution to this challenge, it is by no means beyond reach. Autocratic resilience rests on a complex interplay of institutional design, elite strategies, and mass legitimation. Scholars highlight how regimes combine coercion and co-optation to maintain stability (Svolik 2012; Gerschewski 2023), often reinforcing loyalty through patronal networks rather than ideology (Hale 2014). Beyond repression, legitimacy is cultivated through welfare promises, controlled elections, and nationalist or religious identities (Desai et al. 2009; Guriev & Treisman 2019; Esen & Gümüşçü 2016). Political psychology shows that partisanship, fear, and even personality traits can predispose citizens toward authoritarian rule (Greene & Robertson 2017; Sharafutdinova 2020). Yet autocratic durability is never absolute: protest movements, elite defections, and sudden cascades of dissent reveal its constant fragility (Chenoweth & Stephan 2011; Kuran 1991). This Workshop meets a pressing need: to synthesise cross-disciplinary research on the psychosocial drivers of authoritarian legitimation. It provides a forum to examine how grievances, ressentiment, fear, and belonging translate into mass orientations toward authoritarian politics. By situating these dynamics in comparative and transnational perspective, the Workshop will move the field beyond pathologising publics in autocracies or treating democratic citizens as categorically different. It will help generate an integrated framework and foster collaboration among scholars addressing one of the discipline’s most consequential challenges.
Chenoweth, Erica and Maria J. Stephan. (2011). Why Civil Resistance Works: The Strategic Logic of Nonviolent Conflict. Columbia University Press. Desai, Raj M., Anders Olofsgård and Tarik M. Yousef. (2009). “The Logic of Authoritarian Bargains.” Economics & Politics 21(1): 93-125. Esen, Berk and Sebnem Gümüşçü. (2016) “Rising Competitive Authoritarianism in Turkey.” Third World Quarterly 37(9): 1581-1606 Gerschewski, Johannes. (2023). The Two Logics of Autocratic Rule. Cambridge University Press. Greene, Samuel A. and Graeme B. Robertson. (2017). “Agreeable Authoritarians: Personality and Politics in Contemporary Russia.” Comparative Political Studies 50(13): 1802-1834 Guriev, Sergei and Daniel Treisman. (2019). “Informational Autocrats” Journal of Economic Perspectives 33(4): 100-127. Hale, Henry E. (2014). Patronal Politics: Eurasian Regime Dynamics in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge University Press. Kuran, Timur. (1991). “Now Out of Never: The Element of Surprise in The East European Revolution of 1989” World Politics 44(1): 7-48. Sharafutdinova, Gulnaz. (2020). The Red Mirror: Putin’s Leadership and Russia’s Insecure Identity. Oxford University Press. Svolik, Milan W. (2012). The Politics of Authoritarian Rule. Cambridge University Press.
1: How do citizens in affluent democracies come to embrace political projects that efface their franchise?
2: Why do autocrats with immense coercive capacity put effort into bolstering their public legitimacy?
3: Why do some abandon inclusive institutions while others defend them?
4: What similarities exist between support for authoritarian policies in established democracies and in autocracies?
5: What psychological and social mechanisms underlie tolerance for repression?
Title Details
The impact of digital government platforms on normative regime support under autocracies: Experimental evidence from the CIMER platform in Turkey View Paper Details
The Charismatic Challenger: Comparing the Perceived Charisma of Viktor Orbán and Péter Magyar through the Eyes of Their Followers View Paper Details
How does Propaganda Framing Shape Behavioural Intentions towards International Journalists? Evidence from China View Paper Details
Individualism and Political Personalism View Paper Details
Grievance Pathways to Authoritarian Support View Paper Details
Influencers as Authoritarian Gateways: Social and Psychological Mechanisms of Mainstreaming Among Young Men View Paper Details
The Psychological Underpinnings of Support for Authoritarianism: Evidence from Wartime Russia View Paper Details
Fear, Resentment and the Slide Towards Authoritarianism in Israel View Paper Details
Mobilizing Emotions through Language: Authoritarian Narratives and the Justification of War View Paper Details
Decoding Dictatorship: Experimental Evidence on How Signals of Elite Cohesion Shape Mass Compliance View Paper Details
CYNICAL IDEOLOGY AS A PILLAR OF SUPPORT FOR AUTHORITARIANISM: THE CASE OF TURKEY AFTER MARCH 19 FROM A CRITICAL PERSPECTIVE View Paper Details
Governing the Outrage: Affective Authoritarianism and Anti-Government Protest in Southeast Asia View Paper Details
Governing Teachers for Regime Security After Communism: Rereading China’s Teacher Policy View Paper Details
Normalizing Control: Psychological and Social Roots of Repression Tolerance View Paper Details
A Tale of Two Mobilizations: Competing Reactions to Boycotts After 19 March View Paper Details
Legitimising Repression through Emotions: Autocratic Protest Discourse in Kazakhstan and Tunisia View Paper Details
Framing Democratic Backsliding View Paper Details
Exploring Predictors of Authoritarian Governance Preference in Ghana: A Mixed-Methods Study View Paper Details
The Authoritarian Social Contract: Psychological Foundations of Citizen Denunciations in Non-Democratic Regimes View Paper Details