Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.
Just tap then “Add to Home Screen”
Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.
Just tap then “Add to Home Screen”
This panel focuses on the origins and consequences of the procedural rules governing plenary agenda-setting in parliamentary democracies. We know much about the procedural advantages that majority parties and governments enjoy when it comes to setting the plenary agenda in the US Congress (Cox & McCubbins 1993, 2005), Western Europe (Doering 1995; Rasch & Tsebelis 2011), and East-Central Europe (Zubek 2011). But we know less about the origins and consequences of cross-country and cross-temporal variations in such institutional configurations. Why do national legislatures differ in the extent to which majority parties and governments control the plenary agenda? What are the consequences of such variation for party discipline, legislative output or democratic accountability? The panel is aimed at researchers who are currently conducting comparative research on agenda control in parliamentary democracies.
Title | Details |
---|---|
Decision Making Potential and ‘Detailed’ Legislation of Western European Parliamentary Governments | View Paper Details |
Redesigning Parliament. Mapping Parliamentary Rule Changes in the German Bundestag Since 1949 | View Paper Details |
Parliamentary Agenda Control in European Democracies | View Paper Details |
Cross-Temporal Plenary Advantageous Rules for Majority Parties in Spain (1982-2012) | View Paper Details |