ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

New boundaries of epistemic concerns in deliberative democracy: Towards Possible Solutions

Democracy
Social Movements
Knowledge
Decision Making
Political Engagement
P275
Marta Wojciechowska
Kings College London
Jonathan Benson
University of Manchester

Abstract

While deliberative processes are argued to be able to identify the correct solution (Min & Wong 2018, Talisse 2009, Goodin 2017), quality and availability of information can challenge this ability (Brown 2019, McKay& Tenove 2020). This panel revisits epistemic debates within deliberative democracy and focuses on possible solutions to distorted information in deliberative systems. Papers within this panel focus on different elements of deliberative systems and analyse their possible role in countering the effects of disinformation, conspiracy theories and fake news. Several papers focus on concrete settings: experimental mini-publics in the US and Ireland, bottom-up popular assemblies in Chile, deliberative processes in the UK, and online participatory fora. Others focus instead on the possible power of rhetoric. The panel offers a selection of experimental, normative and practice-driven papers. Bibliography: • Brown, E. (2018) Propaganda, Misinformation, and the Epistemic Value of Democracy, Critical Review, 30:3-4,194-218, DOI: 10.1080/08913811.2018.1575007 • Goodin, R. E. (2017). The epistemic benefits of deliberative democracy. Policy Sciences, 50(3), 351-366. • McKay S, Tenove C. (2020). Disinformation as a Threat to Deliberative Democracy. Political Research Quarterly. doi:10.1177/1065912920938143 • Min, John B, & Wong, James K. (2018). Epistemic approaches to deliberative democracy. Philosophy Compass, 13(6), E12497-N/a. • Talisse, R. (2009). Democracy and Moral Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Title Details
Epistemic Injustice and Expertise in Political Deliberation View Paper Details
Post-truth narratives in the deliberative system: A case for a rhetorical offensive View Paper Details
From mass mobilization to mass deliberation: Popular assemblies in the 2019-2020 Chilean Protests View Paper Details
Countering misperceptions about Covid-19: the effectiveness of mini-publics as a source of correction View Paper Details