ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

Roundtable: The ‘policy stability’ vs. ‘politicisation’ dilemma in climate politics

Conflict
Environmental Policy
Global
Climate Change
Ethics
Energy
P483
Paul Tobin
University of Manchester
Kathryn Hochstetler
The London School of Economics & Political Science
Matthew Paterson
University of Manchester
James Patterson
University of Utrecht
Diarmuid Torney
Dublin City University
Open Section

Abstract

In current debates in climate policy, there is a clear tension between a range of literatures arguing that we need long-term, stable climate policy that can generate ‘lock-in’ to low carbon futures, and a range that focus on the necessity of ongoing political conflict in particular to dislodge the power of incumbent actors. This roundtable is designed to bring together scholars for a focused discussion of these two sets of arguments and how we should think about the dilemma this generates. Understanding the complex tensions and dilemmas that arise out of the interaction between these two dynamics in climate politics will make important contributions both to academic debates in the field and to ideas for more ambitious climate policy action.

Title Details
Contesting Energy Transition in Brazil and South Africa View Paper Details
The promise and limits of anti-capitalism in climate politics View Paper Details
From tame to contentious climate politics? View Paper Details
Do framework climate laws depoliticise or politicise? View Paper Details