In person icon Unfolding Judicial Dialogue in Europe

Abstract

Judicial dialogue in Europe has been a focal point of academic discourse for long. Scholars have extensively examined the reasons why national judges engage in judicial dialogue with supranational courts, and the (constitutional) dynamics behind those processes. For instance, a large number of scholars have investigated the reasons behind the engagement of national courts in the preliminary ruling procedure under article 267 TFEU which is one of the main means of judicial dialogue in Europe. Nevertheless, despite this extensive body of research, new issues and insights continue to emerge. This panel considers the latest academic insights into the dynamics of judicial dialogue in Europe which includes examining the evolving reasons behind national courts’ engagement with the ECJ and the ECtHR, the impact of recent jurisprudence, and the broader implications for effective judicial protection.

Title	Details
Judicial Dialogue on ‘Safe Country of Origin’ Designations: Implications of Recent CJEU Rulings and National Court Referrals	View Paper Details
A Community of Courts Based on a Shared Judicial Culture? Dutch Highest Court Judges and Their Engagement with the European Court of Human Rights	View Paper Details
European Judicial Dialogue on Untouchable Values? Comparative Examination of the Dialogue Between EU Member States’ Constitutional Courts and the CJEU	View Paper Details
The Role of National Courts in the Judicial Review of European Union Law: Engagement in the Preliminary Ruling Procedure	View Paper Details
Referrals to National Constitutional Courts: A Comparative Examination of Constitutional Judicial Referrals	View Paper Details