Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.
Just tap then “Add to Home Screen”
Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.
Just tap then “Add to Home Screen”
The growing emphasis on evidence-based policymaking has brought independent expertise to the forefront of contemporary governance, with experts playing a prominent role in addressing challenges such as the financial crisis, the COVID-19 pandemic, and the climate crisis. Experts not only provide analysis and recommendations but also visibly shape public discourse - standing beside politicians during press briefings and acting as gatekeepers and explainers of complex issues. While their presence has been celebrated as a means to ensure more informed decisions, it has also sparked debate about their legitimacy and democratic accountability. This panel examines the evolving role of expertise in democratic governance, focusing on tensions between expert influence, citizen demands, and democratic principles. Central questions include: To what extent do expert actors influence public policy, and under what conditions? How does their influence vary by type of expertise and across policy domains? And how can this influence coexist with the need to sustain public trust in democratic processes? We also invite papers exploring attitudes toward expertise in governance. While surveys indicate growing support for independent experts in decision-making and technocrats in government, rising skepticism toward scientific expertise and increasing anti-elite rhetoric highlight a significant tension. What constitutes “politically legitimate” expertise in the eyes of citizens, and why do they simultaneously demand and resist greater expert influence in policymaking? This panel invites papers that address these questions, drawing on theoretical, empirical, or comparative approaches.
Title | Details |
---|---|
Does Science Need Democracy? | View Paper Details |
Policy Capacity, Oppositional Choice and Knowledge Referencing in Parliament - The Case of Denmark | View Paper Details |
Techno-Authoritarians and Techno-Populists: Exploring the Relationship for the Support for Experts and Liberal Democracy-Averse Attitudes | View Paper Details |
The Political Dynamics of Expert Group Influence: the Case of Norwegian Advisory Commissions | View Paper Details |
Scientization in Policy-Making: Stakeholder Perspectives on Expert Involvement Across Policy Domains | View Paper Details |