ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription to the ECPR Methods School offers and updates newsletter has been successful.

Discover ECPR's Latest Methods Course Offerings

We use Brevo as our email marketing platform. By clicking below to submit this form, you acknowledge that the information you provided will be transferred to Brevo for processing in accordance with their terms of use.

Philosophy and Methodology of the Social Sciences: A Pluralistic Framework

Course Dates and Times

Friday 26 February: 13:00-15:00 and 15.30-17.00
Saturday 27 February: 09.30-11.30 and 12.30-14.30
7.5 hours over two days

Robert Adcock

adcockrk@gmail.com

American University

The social sciences have long been concerned with the epistemic status of their claims. Unlike in the natural sciences, where an evident record of practical success tends to make the exploration of such philosophical issues a tangential endeavour, in the social sciences, there is an important and evident relation between differences in philosophies (explicit or implicit) of science of varied researchers and the kind of social-scientific work that they do. Philosophy of science issues are, in this way, closer to the surface of social-scientific research, and part of being a self-aware social scientist involves coming to terms with these issues. This course will provide a pluralistic framework for identifying, discussing, and debating alternative philosophical positions, their assumptions, and their implications for the ways in which research is conducted and judged.


Instructor Bio

Robert Adcock teaches at the School of International Service at American University in Washington DC.

His interests focus on the politics and sociology of knowledge, the transatlantic history of the social sciences and their relationship to liberalism, and the philosophy and methods of the social sciences.

Robert is the author of Liberalism and the Emergence of American Political Science: A Transatlantic Tale (Oxford University Press, 2014), and was the co-editor of Modern Political Science: Anglo-American Exchanges since 1880 (Princeton University Press, 2007).

He also edited the newsletter of the Qualitative and Multi-Method Research organised section of the American Political Science Association from 2011 to 2014.

This course is a broad survey of epistemological, ontological, and methodological issues relevant to knowledge production in the social sciences. The course has three overlapping objectives:

  • To provide you with a grounding in these issues as they are conceptualised and debated by philosophers, social theorists, and intellectuals more generally
  • To introduce some of the ways in which these issues have been incorporated (all too often incompletely or inaccurately) into the social sciences
  • To promote reflection on how these issues relate to your own empirical research

This is neither a technical research design nor a proposal writing class, but is pitched at a more philosophical level. As we proceed through the course, however, you should come to appreciate the consequences of philosophical debates for the design and conduct of empirical research in the social sciences. You are encouraged to approach this course as an opportunity to think critically, creatively, and expansively about the status of social scientific knowledge, both that which you have produced and/or will produce, and that produced by others.

The 'science question' rests more heavily on the social than the natural sciences, for the simple reason that the successes of the natural sciences in enhancing the human ability to control and manipulate the physical world offer an effective rejoinder to scepticism regarding the scientific status of fields such as physics and biology. The social sciences have long laboured in the shadow of these successes. One response has been to try to model the social sciences on one or another of the natural sciences, or more specifically, on one or another philosophical account of knowledge production in those sciences. This naturalism forms one of the recurrent moves in the philosophy of the social sciences. We will engage it, both in its incarnation in the Logical Positivism of the Vienna Circle, and in the more widespread embrace of falsification as a demarcation criterion for science. Problems generated by the emphasis on law-like generalisations in these naturalistic approaches to social science subsequently informed both the reformulated naturalism of critical realism, and the rejection of naturalism by followers of classical sociologists like Max Weber. Finally, we consider the tradition of critical theory with its commitment to reflexive knowledge.

While not an exhaustive survey of issues in the philosophy of the social sciences, the course offers an opportunity to explore perennial issues of great relevance for the conduct of social science research, the methodological training of new social scientists, and the aspirations of many social scientists to receive some of the public attention, respect, and funding that natural scientists routinely enjoy. The course should thus serve as a solid foundation for subsequent reading and reflection.

This course centres on the survey of philosophical issues, typology of alternate stances, and argument for methodological pluralism advanced in Patrick Jackson’s The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of Science and Its Implications for the Study of World Politics (New York: Routledge, 2011). We will also read short articles from other political scientists treating the same issues as Jackson in different ways to better situate Jackson’s approach. The course sessions will be seminars that combine framing presentations by the instructor with extensive class discussion. The goal of these sessions is not only to help students understand Jackson’s terminology, assumptions, and arguments, but also to spur the clarification and articulation of their own philosophical judgments and stances, which may well diverge to a greater or lesser extent from that of Jackson.

This course presumes no prior detailed familiarity with philosophy of science or social science. The course does, however, presume openness to thinking of social science as a philosophy in addition to a more technical endeavour. A course in twentieth century philosophy during one’s university training would be a plus, and reading good survey books like Richard Bernstein’s The Restructuring of Social and Political Theory (University of Pennsylvania Press, 1976) or Peter Godfrey Smith’s Theory and Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science (University of Chicago Press, 2003) would serve as a refresher. The course will centre on Patrick Jackson’s The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of Science and Its Implications for the Study of World Politics (New York: Routledge, 2011) and students are encouraged to purchase the book and read it fully before coming to the Winter School, so that their reading of it while in Bamberg is for review and reflection to prepare for discussing, analysing, and debating it together, rather than an entirely first encounter with it.

Day Topic Details
Friday The Science Question and Neo-Positivism Instructor presentation and seminar discussion: ~ 1 hr of presentation, 2hrs of discussion
Saturday morning Critical Realism and Analyticism Instructor presentation and seminar discussion: ~ 1 hr of presentation, 2hrs of discussion
Saturday afternoon Reflexivity and Methodological Pluralism Instructor presentation and seminar discussion: ~ 1 hr of presentation, 2hrs of discussion
Day Readings
Friday Jackson, Conduct of Inquiry, Chs. 1-3. Robert Keohane. 2009. “Political Science as a Vocation.” PS 42, no. 2: 359-63
Saturday morning Jackson, Conduct of Inquiry, Chs. 4-5
Saturday afternoon Jackson, Conduct of Inquiry, Chs. 6-7. Mark Bevir. 2008. “Meta-Methodology.” In Janet M.Box-Steffensmeier, Henry E. Brady, and David Collier, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology. New York, Oxford UP, 48-70.

Software Requirements

None

Hardware Requirements

None

Literature

None